“Josh Hall is requesting $65,000 per month in spousal support from [Christina] on a 2 year, 9 month marriage which is outrageous when he is self-supporting,” the filing reads.
The HGTV star further alleged that her ex “has no need for spousal support” since he “just paid over $70,000 to pay off the lease” on a Bentley.
Christina Haack claimed her estranged husband, Josh Hall, is seeking an “outrageous” $65,000 per month in spousal support. thechristinahall/instagram
“Josh Hall is requesting $65,000 per month in spousal support from [Christina] on a 2 year, 9 month marriage which is outrageous when he is self-supporting,” her filing reads. Instagram / @unbrokenjosh
Hall responded to Haack’s claims on his Instagram Story Wednesday, claiming her statements were “riddled with lies and assumptions.”
He also addressed Haack’s lawyer, Matthew S. DeArmey, saying the legal move was an “interesting tactic for someone who is a licensed attorney and took an oath of integrity.
“Pretty sure making provably false statements to a judge is unethical,” Hall added, per People.
The HGTV star further alleged that Josh “just paid over $70,000 to pay off the lease” on a Bentley and has “no need for spousal support.” unbrokenjosh/Instagram Hall responded to Haack’s claims on his Instagram Story, alleging her declarations were “riddled with lies and assumptions.” WireImage
A rep for Hall did not immediately respond to Page Six’s request for comment.
Hall claimed he made a global settlement offer to the “Flip or Flop” alum, but she denied his terms and listed the property anyway.
He also took aim at his estranged wife’s lawyer, writing, “Interesting tactic for someone who is a licensed attorney and took an oath of integrity.” CHRISTINA HAACK/INSTAGRAM The recent filing comes after Haack accused her ex of “stealing” money from her and her kids amid their messy split. unbrokenjosh/Instagram
As their previous agreement stated, Hall was allowed to live in the home for 12 days last month when it was unoccupied.
Josh went on to allege in the court documents that Haack failed to get a court order for the sale of the home — which she is the sole owner of — nor did she get his permission when she asked on Sept. 23.
He has since moved to another Tennessee property, where he is allegedly “suffering prejudice” because of the increase in his living expenses.
For more celebrity and entertainment news, visit pagesix.com.
Get updates delivered to you daily. Free and customizable.
It’s essential to note our commitment to transparency:
Our Terms of Use acknowledge that our services may not always be error-free, and our Community Standards emphasize our discretion in enforcing policies. As a platform hosting over 100,000 pieces of content published daily, we cannot pre-vet content, but we strive to foster a dynamic environment for free expression and robust discourse through safety guardrails of human and AI moderation.
Local News
