Open in App
  • U.S.
  • Election
  • Newsletter
  • New York Post

    Ohio blocked from implementing law restricting children’s use of Instagram, TikTok

    By Reuters,

    2024-02-12

    https://img.particlenews.com/image.php?url=2IyOqD_0rI4gsv300

    A federal judge on Monday prevented Ohio from implementing a new law that requires social media companies, including Meta Platform’s Instagram and ByteDance’s TikTok, to obtain parental consent before allowing children under 16 to use their platforms.

    Chief US District Judge Algenon Marbley in Columbia agreed with the tech industry trade group NetChoice that the law violated minors’ free speech rights under the Constitution’s First Amendment.

    It marked the latest court decision blocking a state’s law designed to protect young people online as federal and state lawmakers look for ways to address rising concerns about the dangers posed by social media to the mental health of children .

    Confused Biden looks lost as he wanders behind podium, stares at the floor as Jordan’s King Abdullah II speaks

    Ohio’s Republican attorney general, Dave Yost, had argued that the state’s Social Media Parental Notification Act, which the legislature passed in July, was a valid measure aimed at protecting minors from damage to their mental health and sexual predators.

    But Marbley agreed with NetChoice, whose members include TikTok, Elon Musk’s X, Alphabet’s YouTube, and Meta’s Facebook and Instagram, that the law was “not narrowly tailored to those ends.”

    https://img.particlenews.com/image.php?url=4ODjVL_0rI4gsv300
    Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg testifying at a Senate hearing last month. AFP via Getty Images

    Elon Musk’s X hopes to lure back advertisers by letting brands run videos next to creators

    https://img.particlenews.com/image.php?url=4eJXQe_0rI4gsv300
    Tech industry trade group NetChoice argued that the law violated minors’ free speech rights under the Constitution’s First Amendment. AP

    “Foreclosing minors under sixteen from accessing all content on websites that the Act purports to cover, absent affirmative parental consent, is a breathtakingly blunt instrument for reducing social media’s harm to children,” he wrote.

    Monday’s ruling put Ohio’s law on hold indefinitely while the litigation continues after the judge last month issued an order that temporarily blocked it from taking effect on Jan. 15 as scheduled.

    CLICK HERE TO SIGN UP FOR OUR MORNING REPORT NEWSLETTER

    Ohio Governor Mike DeWine, a Republican, called the ruling disappointing. He cited “overwhelming evidence that social media has a negative effect on the mental health of minors, including increases in depression and suicide-related behavior.”

    https://img.particlenews.com/image.php?url=3mQmoS_0rI4gsv300
    The ruling marked the latest court decision blocking a state’s law designed to protect young people online as lawmakers look for ways to address rising concerns about the dangers posed by social media to the mental health of children. NurPhoto via Getty Images

    “Since the federal courts are interpreting federal constitutional law as preventing the state of Ohio from protecting Ohio’s children, then Congress needs to act to protect our country’s children,” he said in a statement.

    NetChoice last year won court rulings blocking a similar social media parental consent law in Arkansas and a children’s digital privacy law in California.

    It is challenging restrictions adopted in Utah as well.

    For top headlines, breaking news and more, visit nypost.com.

    Expand All
    Comments / 0
    Add a Comment
    YOU MAY ALSO LIKE
    Most Popular newsMost Popular

    Comments / 0