Was Yesterday’s Stock Drop a Harbinger of War? Decoding Warren Buffett’s Moves

Back in the late 1990s, I worked for a stockbroker, and one of my tasks was to monitor the ticker scrolling at the bottom of the NYSE screens. Since I'm not particularly fond of math, this job could get monotonous. To make it more engaging, I often discussed with my coworkers the intriguing relationship between stock market movements and major global events, like wars. There's a common belief that the stock market takes a nosedive before a major conflict and that prominent investors sell off large portions of their holdings in anticipation. However, the reality behind this narrative is much more complex and not as straightforward as it might appear.

This article explores several instances where stock market declines preceded significant global conflicts and whether these declines were indicative of the forthcoming events.

World War I and the Stock Market

World War I offers an early example of how stock markets can react to geopolitical tensions. In the months leading up to the outbreak of the war in 1914, there was considerable financial instability. The assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand in June 1914 heightened tensions across Europe, leading to uncertainty in global markets.

On July 31, 1914, the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) closed its doors to prevent a market crash as European markets were already in turmoil. This was the first time the NYSE had closed for an extended period (it remained closed for nearly four months), reflecting the severity of the situation. When it reopened in December 1914, the Dow Jones Industrial Average (DJIA) had dropped significantly, though it rebounded in subsequent years as war-driven demand boosted industrial production​ (Business Insider Markets)​.

World War II and Market Reactions

Similarly, before World War II, the stock market showed signs of distress. In the years leading up to the war, the world was still recovering from the Great Depression. The DJIA had fallen dramatically in 1929 and remained volatile throughout the 1930s.

In the late 1930s, as tensions in Europe escalated, markets once again responded with uncertainty. The Munich Agreement of 1938, which was seen as an appeasement to Nazi Germany, temporarily eased fears, leading to a brief market rally. However, by September 1939, when Germany invaded Poland, triggering the war, the markets declined. This pattern shows that while markets can decline in response to geopolitical tensions, they also react to attempts at diplomatic resolutions, even if those attempts are ultimately unsuccessful​ (Business Insider Markets)​.

The Cuban Missile Crisis

Another notable example is the Cuban Missile Crisis of 1962, a key event during the Cold War. As the United States and the Soviet Union faced off over the placement of nuclear missiles in Cuba, global markets experienced significant volatility. The DJIA dropped as the crisis deepened, reflecting fears of a potential nuclear war. However, the market recovered quickly once the crisis was resolved, highlighting how sensitive markets are to both the threat and resolution of conflict​ (9to5Mac)​.

Warren Buffett and Modern Market Movements

In more recent history, Warren Buffett has become a symbol of cautious yet opportunistic investing during times of economic uncertainty. During the 2008 financial crisis, Buffett made significant investments in companies like Goldman Sachs, betting on their recovery. His actions during such times are often scrutinized for potential insights into broader market trends.

However, the idea that Buffett or other major investors always sell off large portions of their holdings before a major conflict is not consistently supported by evidence.

For instance, yesterday on Twitter (X), there were many claims that Buffett sold 55% of his Apple shares and that World War 3 would now start in the Middle East. According to Fox News, Buffett did reduce his Apple holdings, this was part of a broader, long-term investment strategy and not necessarily a reaction to geopolitical events. Furthermore, Buffett's investment activities are often driven by market conditions and valuations rather than specific predictions about global conflicts​ (9to5Mac)​.

Does the Market Always Fall Before War?

The historical record shows that stock markets do react to the buildup of tensions before major conflicts, but this reaction is not always a straightforward decline. Markets can be volatile, with both sharp drops and recoveries, depending on how events unfold and how investors interpret those events.

For example, the stock market experienced a significant decline before the Gulf War in 1990, as uncertainty loomed over the conflict. However, once the war began and its outcome seemed more certain, the markets quickly rebounded. This pattern has been observed in various other conflicts, suggesting that while markets do react to the threat of war, they are also responsive to the resolution or progression of those conflicts.

TO SUMMARIZE

The idea that stock markets always fall before major wars and that investors like Warren Buffett sell off large portions of their portfolios in anticipation is an oversimplification. While there is historical evidence that markets react to geopolitical tensions, these reactions are complex and influenced by a multitude of factors, including economic conditions, investor sentiment, and the nature of the conflict itself. Understanding these patterns requires a nuanced analysis of both historical and current events, rather than reliance on a single narrative.

What do YOU think?

NYSEPhoto byAI