Get updates delivered to you daily. Free and customizable.
POLITICO
Trump doesn’t want to talk about a national abortion ban. Harris doesn’t want to talk restrictions.
By Megan Messerly,
20 hours ago
Tuesday night’s debate offered a sharp contrast between the two candidates and their approaches on abortion. | Saul Loeb/AFP via Getty Images
Former President Donald Trump would not commit to vetoing a national abortion ban. Vice President Kamala Harris would not say which restrictions she would support on the procedure.
Tuesday night’s debate offered a sharp contrast between the two candidates and their approaches on abortion. But what both had in common — a fear of alienating their bases.
The exchange highlighted the tightrope both candidates feel they must walk — appearing moderate so as not to alienate middle-of-the-road voters who support abortion access with some restrictions, without saying anything that could cause their most ardent supporters’ enthusiasm to wane. It’s been a particular problem for Trump, who has angered anti-abortion-rights advocates on several occasions by suggesting that the federal government has no more role to play in legislating abortion.
Harris used her time to excoriate Trump for appointing the Supreme Court justices key to overturning Roe v. Wade . And she tried to undercut one of Trump’s most-used arguments — that ending Roe and returning it to the states is what most people wanted.
“You want to talk about, this is what people wanted?” Harris said. “A 12- or 13-year-old survivor of incest being forced to carry a pregnancy to term. They don't want that.”
It was the starkest and clearest answer Harris has given on the implications of the fall of Roe and emblematic of the way her campaign has used the stories of women — including at the Democratic National Convention last month — to make that argument.
Trump, meanwhile, reiterated his support for his leave-abortion-to-the-states approach, which he said was only possible because of the “great courage” of the Supreme Court. But he wouldn’t weigh in on a veto of a national abortion ban — something Ohio Sen. JD Vance , Trump’s running mate, has said that the former president would do — saying that he “didn’t discuss it with JD, in all fairness.”
“They can never get this approved so it doesn’t matter,” Trump said. “I’m not signing a ban and there’s no reason to sign a ban.”
The two also had a back and forth on abortions later in pregnancy, with Trump suggesting incorrectly that Harris favors allowing abortion in the “8th or 9th” month of pregnancy. The vice president, who declined to say what limits she would favor on abortion, supports restoring Roe , which would protect abortion access until fetal viability, which is around the 22nd week of pregnancy. States could still restrict abortion beyond that point, though not all do so.
“Nowhere in America is a woman carrying a pregnancy to term and asking for an abortion,” Harris said. “That’s not happening, that’s insulting to the women of America.”
Harris also highlighted the ripple effects of the fall of Roe , nodding to an Alabama Supreme Court ruling earlier this year that said that frozen embryos are people, briefly halting some IVF services in the state. She said women were being denied such services because of “Donald Trump’s abortion bans.”
“Another lie, it’s another lie,” Trump said, calling himself “a leader on IVF.”
Trump has expressed support for IVF, and announced late last month that he would make IVF treatments free, paid for by the government or health insurance companies.
One fact that did come out during the debate that Karmila didn't try to deny is the fact that she is a Marxist
Ford Country
3h ago
It is obvious by the comments that both sides have all ready made up their minds and Did Not LISTEN to what each had to say. By both sides I mean Any Democrats comments and Republican. comments.
Get updates delivered to you daily. Free and customizable.
It’s essential to note our commitment to transparency:
Our Terms of Use acknowledge that our services may not always be error-free, and our Community Standards emphasize our discretion in enforcing policies. As a platform hosting over 100,000 pieces of content published daily, we cannot pre-vet content, but we strive to foster a dynamic environment for free expression and robust discourse through safety guardrails of human and AI moderation.