Adams’ reelection fundraising stalls after criminal indictment
By Jeff Coltin,
22 hours ago
NEW YORK — Mayor Eric Adams, typically a prodigious fundraiser, brought in just one donation of $250 in the 2½ weeks since his federal indictment .
Adams raised $212,416 during the last three months, which POLITICO first reported — making it his slowest fundraising period since he took office and began planning for his 2025 reelection, according to a filing with the New York City Campaign Finance Board Tuesday.
Adams’ lack of post-indictment campaign support stands in contrast to former President Donald Trump, whose team said it raised more than $15 million in the two weeks after Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg indicted him.
Trump has aggressively solicited donations based on his legal woes, while the New York mayor doesn’t even have a campaign website. His team doesn’t send out standard emails or texts requesting money, and lacks an easily accessible online fundraising portal.
Instead, the campaign for the embattled mayor hosts fundraising events, such as a Saturday lunch his brother Bernard hosted at a Chinese restaurant in Queens, or a birthday party for the mayor at a Manhattan club.
Adams had also been soliciting money for his legal defense fund, and its quarterly report is due Tuesday.
Compliance attorney Vito Pitta declined to share that fundraising total ahead of time, but a person familiar with the operation said donations also slowed after Adams was criminally charged and those managing the fund temporarily stopped soliciting.
Adams’ electoral campaign brought in a relatively small amount since July. But the person familiar with his fundraising operation, who was granted anonymity to speak about internal discussions, said that was by design, and that the mayor stopped fundraising after making a final push to hit his roughly $7 million spending limit for the primary — as long as he gets public matching funds.
“Mayor Adams’ strong support from New Yorkers continues — and the campaign has now raised the maximum amount it can spend in the primary with anticipated matching funds for his reelection far ahead of schedule,” Pitta said in a statement.
Adams reported raising $4.14 million for his reelection campaign, and still has $3.11 million on hand. That’s a massive lead over all of his declared challengers . City Comptroller Brad Lander, the best-funded Democrat taking on Adams, has raised $967,381 and former Comptroller Scott Stringer has brought in $591,116 for their respective bids.
The Campaign Finance Board has yet to determine whether it will grant Adams the $4.35 million in public matching funds his campaign says it has qualified for. Federal prosecutors charged Adams with running an illegal straw donor scheme, something board officials said they would consider ahead of the first scheduled payout in December.
Adams’ filing showed his campaign refunded nearly $83,000 in donations this period, a higher rate than usual.
Even without matching funds, Adams would still have more than $3 million on hand to run, but his lead would be erased if Lander or Stringer are granted public funds. Lander expects as much as $3.49 million in December and Stringer says he’s qualified for $2.47 million.
Lander’s campaign is eager for that scenario.
“With Brad’s strong fundraising and major questions swirling around Eric Adams’ ability to qualify for matching funds due to his federal indictment, Brad Lander has raised the most money — and has the most to spend — of any candidate for mayor,” Lander senior adviser Rebecca Rodriguez said in a statement.
The city board provides $8 for every $1 raised — up to $250 — from New York City donors in one of the country’s most generous campaign finance programs.
Adams’ filing also revealed that he appears to have cut ties with Brianna Suggs, his former campaign fundraiser whose home federal investigators raided last fall.
Adams has not reported making any payments to Suggs since April — even though the mayor said in July she was still working on the campaign as a “chief administrator.”
Get updates delivered to you daily. Free and customizable.
It’s essential to note our commitment to transparency:
Our Terms of Use acknowledge that our services may not always be error-free, and our Community Standards emphasize our discretion in enforcing policies. As a platform hosting over 100,000 pieces of content published daily, we cannot pre-vet content, but we strive to foster a dynamic environment for free expression and robust discourse through safety guardrails of human and AI moderation.