Open in App
  • Local
  • U.S.
  • Election
  • Politics
  • Crime
  • Sports
  • Lifestyle
  • Education
  • Real Estate
  • Newsletter
  • Daily Journal of Commerce

    Leaking underground storage tanks still pose problems

    By The Associated Press,

    2024-05-31

    By Jordan Gass-Poore

    The Uproot Project

    Nearly half of Americans depend on groundwater for their drinking water, according to the Environmental Protection Agency. A city’s water supply, while treated and processed to make sure it meets federal standards, may still collect contaminants from gas leaks on its way to the tap. In some cases, this can happen when the water originates from an unregulated well some cities get their drinking water from a mix of surface water and groundwater or through cracked pipes.

    For privately owned wells, which aren’t regulated by the government, the homeowner has the responsibility to treat and filter the water.

    How leaks happen

    Environmental experts say even a pinprick-size hole in an underground tank can send 400 gallons of fuel into the ground in a year, polluting soil and water. Spills can also destroy habitat and kill wildlife. Roughly 81 million people live within a quarter-mile of an underground storage tank that’s experienced at least one leak, based on the latest EPA data .

    Most tanks, made of steel in the mid-1980s, are likely to corrode over time. Modern tanks are fiberglass, which is more resistant to corrosion, but all tanks begin to leak sooner or later, said Kelly Pennell, a professor of environmental engineering and water resources at the University of Kentucky. Cylindrical tanks typically hold tens of thousands of gallons of fuel.

    Detecting leaks is not easy, Pennell said.

    “If a gasoline station operated for 10 or 15 years, you may not be able to detect those small leaks,” she said. “You wouldn’t be losing 1,000 gallons a day you’re losing drips but over time those (drips) matter.”

    Leaks can form chemical plumes that move through groundwater and turn into vapor that rises through cracks in the foundations of homes and businesses. Those fumes can contain cancer-causing chemicals including benzene, an ingredient in gasoline. And they carry a risk of fire and explosion. When contamination was found in Canob Park, a tiny neighborhood in Richmond, Rhode Island, the local fire chief sampled drinking water at one of the service stations and said it was “almost ignitable.”

    Cleaning up groundwater pollution is costly, said Anne Rabe, environmental policy director at the New York Public Interest Research Group, a nonprofit that works on environmental issues, including leaking underground storage tanks.

    “You really have to do extensive testing to determine when these underground storage tanks are leaking and take immediate action or every week it spreads and spreads, and that increases the cost of remediation,” Rabe said.

    More than 516,000 leaks have been cleaned up since Congress directed the EPA to begin regulating underground tanks in 1984, but more than 57,000 known sites still await a full cleanup, the EPA said.

    Cleanup costs

    The average cost to clean up a site is $154,000, according to the Association of State and Territorial Solid Waste Management Officials, which acts as a liaison between state and territorial leaking underground storage tank programs and the EPA. But that cost can be much higher or lower depending on how much work is needed.

    The owners of tanks are supposed to carry insurance and pay for cleanup, but that doesn’t always happen. A trust fund that gets money from a gas tax helps it currently holds about $1.5 billion but the program costs states and the federal governmentabout $1 billion per yearbeyond the fund.

    While leaking underground storage tanks are in nearly every town in the U.S., people who live closest to these sites tend to be in communities that are lower income with a higher proportion of minorities, according to the EPA.

    TheEPArequires owners and operators of underground storage tanks to install approved leak detection equipment and to regularly test these systems. But they aren’t foolproof. There are different types of systems, and any one type can miss a leak or its magnitude. Trade associations suggest building a system that uses more than one leak detection method, but that doesn’t always happen, and sometimes the one chosen may not be the best one for a particular tank. And owners may not maintain them properly.

    Compliance with the regulations, the EPA estimated in 2015, would cost tank owners and operators a total of $160 million per year or about $715 per facility per year. But it would mean less taxpayer money needed for cleanups, the agency said.

    Some of the cleanups since the program began got funding from federal and state brownfields programs, which encourage the cleanup and reuse of contaminated or potentially contaminated sites.

    TheEPA last year announceda $315 million historic investment in the brownfields program, with most of the money coming from the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act of 2021.

    Editor’s note: This article is a collaboration between The Associated Press and The Uproot Project.

    Copyright © 2024 BridgeTower Media. All Rights Reserved.

    Expand All
    Comments / 0
    Add a Comment
    YOU MAY ALSO LIKE
    Most Popular newsMost Popular

    Comments / 0