State of play: Grants Pass v. Johnson involves a 2018 lawsuit targeting a city code in Oregon that prohibits sleeping in public parks — even if there's no available shelter.
People found guilty under the Grants Pass ordinance can face jail time and fines, which homeless plaintiffs argued violates the Eighth Amendment clause of "cruel and unusual punishment."
San Francisco doesn't support Grants Pass' ordinance, which City Attorney David Chiu said strips basic protections, but did submit an amicus brief to the Supreme Court arguing the lower court ruling " overextended the Eighth Amendment ."
What they're saying: The case has "left our cities without the necessary tools to strike this balance between providing compassionate shelter services ... and keeping our streets safe and accessible," Chiu told Axios.
The other side: Nisha Kashyap, an attorney with the Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights of the San Francisco Bay Area who's representing unhoused people in a separate lawsuit against San Francisco, told Axios a ruling in favor of Grants Pass could give cities "carte blanche" to use punitive tools.
"Cities will be able to push their own residents out simply because they can't afford a place to live."
Yes, but: The Supreme Court's decision is unlikely to result in a major change in San Francisco's day-to-day operations.
Grants Pass "has to do with the concept of enforcing the law without offers of shelter," which are standard for San Francisco, street response coordination director Sam Dodge told Axios.
Kashyap also pointed to a voter proposition approved in 2016 that requires the city to give 24-hour advance notice and offer available shelter before clearing a tent. The city must also store personal property for up to 90 days.
The Lawyers' Committee lawsuit is more about the "yawning gap" between what the city says it's doing and what it's actually doing, she added.
That remains the "fundamental crisis at the heart of these problems," according to Margot Kushel, director of the UCSF Benioff Homelessness and Housing Initiative.
"We have effective strategies to address behavioral health concerns, but they all — at the end of the day — require ... housing," Kushel told Axios via email.
What's next: The Supreme Court's ruling is expected in June.
Get updates delivered to you daily. Free and customizable.
Welcome to NewsBreak, an open platform where diverse perspectives converge. Most of our content comes from established publications and journalists, as well as from our extensive network of tens of thousands of creators who contribute to our platform. We empower individuals to share insightful viewpoints through short posts and comments. It’s essential to note our commitment to transparency: our Terms of Use acknowledge that our services may not always be error-free, and our Community Standards emphasize our discretion in enforcing policies. We strive to foster a dynamic environment for free expression and robust discourse through safety guardrails of human and AI moderation. Join us in shaping the news narrative together.
Comments / 0