California AI Bill Amended; Final Vote Expected by End of August

Photo byGetty Images

California's contentious artificial intelligence (AI) bill, SB 1047, has undergone significant amendments as it moves toward a final vote in the state assembly by the end of August. The bill, initially designed to impose stringent regulations on AI developers, has sparked intense debate among industry leaders, legislators, and advocacy groups.

The bill, introduced by Senator Scott Wiener, aims to establish safety measures for AI systems to prevent potential harms such as misinformation, discrimination, and nonconsensual deepfakes. However, it has faced substantial opposition from Silicon Valley, where concerns have been raised about its potential impact on innovation.

One of the most significant changes to the bill involves the removal of a provision that would have required AI labs to submit certifications of safety test results under penalty of perjury. This amendment was made after industry feedback, with companies arguing that the original requirement could stifle innovation and disproportionately impact smaller businesses and startups. Instead, AI developers will now be required to submit public statements outlining their safety practices, without the threat of criminal liability.

“As the representative from Silicon Valley, I have been pushing for thoughtful regulation around artificial intelligence to protect workers and address potential risks," said Representative Ro Khanna. "But I am concerned that the bill, as initially written, would be ineffective and could punish small businesses."

Photo byGetty Images

The revised bill still seeks to enforce safety standards but does so in a manner that is seen as more accommodating to the concerns of the tech industry. TechNet, a network of technology companies including major players like Anthropic, Apple, Google, and Meta, has been one of the most vocal opponents of the bill. These companies argue that while safety is crucial, the bill's provisions could create an undue burden on AI development, particularly for open-source models.

The bill's amendments have not quelled all opposition. Critics from the AI safety community argue that the changes may weaken the bill's effectiveness in preventing AI-related harms. However, proponents believe the revisions strike a necessary balance between innovation and regulation.

Senator Wiener has acknowledged the pushback but remains committed to advancing the legislation. "We have made adjustments to address some of the concerns raised by the industry, but our focus remains on ensuring that AI development in California is conducted safely and responsibly," Wiener stated.

The bill is now poised for a vote in the California Assembly, where it is expected to pass given the Democratic majority. If approved, SB 1047 will mark a significant step in AI regulation, potentially setting a precedent for other states and at the federal level.

As the debate continues, the outcome of the vote will be closely watched by both supporters and opponents of the bill, with many viewing it as a critical moment in the ongoing discussion about the role of government in regulating emerging technologies.