Alaska Governor Vetoes Bill Mandating Yearly Insurance Coverage for Birth Control

Photo byGetty Images

Governor Mike Dunleavy has vetoed a bipartisan bill that would have required insurance companies to cover up to a year's supply of birth control at a time, a move that has sparked criticism from supporters of the legislation.

The bill, known as House Bill 17, was passed with significant support from both sides of the aisle in the Alaska Legislature. It aimed to improve access to contraceptives, especially for those living in rural areas where healthcare services are less accessible. Under current conditions, Alaskans can only obtain one to three months of birth control at a time, which can be particularly burdensome for residents in remote parts of the state.

In his veto message, Governor Dunleavy explained his decision, stating, "Contraceptives are widely available, and compelling insurance companies to provide mandatory coverage for a year is bad policy." He argued that the legislation would impose unnecessary requirements on insurance companies.

The bill had garnered broad support in the state legislature, passing the Republican-controlled House by a vote of 29-11 and the Senate by 16-3. Proponents of the bill, including its sponsor, Democratic Representative Ashley Carrick of Fairbanks, expressed deep disappointment with the governor's veto.

"Governor Dunleavy’s veto of HB 17, after eight years of tireless effort, overwhelming community support, and positive collaboration with the insurance companies, is deeply disappointing," said Rep. Carrick. She emphasized that the bill was designed to ensure that every Alaskan, regardless of their location, has access to essential medication like birth control.

Advocates for the bill also highlighted the difficulties faced by Alaskans in rural areas, where pharmacies are often few and far between. Rose O’Hara-Jolley, Alaska state director for Planned Parenthood Alliance Advocates, criticized the veto, saying, "Those who live outside of our urban centers — either year-round or seasonally — deserve the same access to birth control as those who live near a pharmacy."

Supporters of the bill argued that improving access to birth control could help reduce the number of unintended pregnancies and abortions in the state. The bill's opponents, however, maintained that such mandates on insurance companies were unnecessary and could lead to increased costs.

The veto has added to ongoing tensions between the governor and the state legislature, with some lawmakers expressing frustration over what they perceive as a lack of collaboration from the executive branch. "There’s a growing sense of distaste for the administration," said Rep. Carrick. "Until the governor’s office shows a willingness to have a conversation and collaboration, it will be very hard for our state to move forward and get things done."

As Alaska continues to grapple with issues of healthcare access, particularly in its more remote regions, the debate over House Bill 17 underscores the challenges of balancing policy, public health, and political considerations.