Open in App
  • Local
  • U.S.
  • Election
  • Politics
  • Sports
  • Lifestyle
  • Education
  • Real Estate
  • Newsletter
  • Sourcing Journal

    Yellow Found Liable for $6.5 Billion in Pension Claims

    By Glenn Taylor,

    7 days ago
    https://img.particlenews.com/image.php?url=4IUoph_0vcEOwi600

    A federal bankruptcy judge ruled that the estate of Yellow Corp. is liable for $6.5 billion in debt claims made by its pension funds.

    Judge Craig T. Goldblatt ruled the “withdrawal liability” claims must be paid out to the 11 multi-employer pension plans that the insolvent trucking firm exited when it shut down last July . In the time since, the company has avoided payment to any of the funds.

    The judge did not set a payment amount, or calculate how much is allocated to each individual pension plan.

    Earlier this year, Yellow already sold off 130 owned terminals for $1.88 billion and 23 leased properties for $92 million in separate auctions, and sold off 60,000 trucks, trailers and equipment for roughly $114 million. While this was enough to cover all of Yellow’s secured debt, including the $850 million it owed the U.S. Treasury, it will not satisfy the pension claims.

    As of Sept. 2, the trucking firm had $350 million in cash.

    Yellow stock plummeted 88 percent last Friday in the wake of the news—a major concern for shareholders like hedge fund MFN Partners, which acquired a more than 40 percent stake in the company ahead of its bankruptcy filing last summer.

    The Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation (PBGC), which regulates retirement funds of private sector workers, now has the authority to issue rules on calculating the penalty Yellow must pay for withdrawing from the retirement plans.

    PBGC argued to the bankruptcy court that other companies with traditional pension plans would be more enticed to cancel their retirement benefits if Yellow won, as shareholders wouldn’t be forced to pay a weighty penalty.

    Yellow previously argued that it shouldn’t be liable because the pension funds received $41.1 billion in Covid-era relief from PBGC under the American Rescue Plan Act. But Goldblatt rejected the arguments, noting that the funds received through special financial assistance should be treated as if received over time, even if received as a lump sum.

    Goldblatt gave Yellow one small victory in the ruling, deciding that the pensioner’s liability needed to be capped at 20 years of annual payments.

    To kick off September, MFN Partners had proposed a Chapter 11 reorganization that was contingent on the court ruling in Yellow’s favor. With that plan in tow, the firm had sought to create a real estate investment trust (REIT) to manage and sell its remaining portfolio of trucking terminals.

    Last month, the bankruptcy court permitted the firm to retain real estate services provider CBRE so it could sell 46 owned and 70 leased locations.

    The complications of Yellow’s bankruptcy are also compounded by an ongoing class-action lawsuit against the company, with nearly 25,000 former employees alleging that they weren’t notified of their layoff with advance notice.

    According to those claims, the former less-than-truckload (LTL) giant failed to provide Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification (WARN) Act notices to employees prior to their mass layoffs, as required by state laws. Combined, the claims total as much as $244 million.

    The defunct firm has retorted that such a notice was not feasible, and that it qualifies under the “unforeseeable business circumstances,” “faltering company” and “liquidating fiduciary” exceptions set forth in the WARN Act.

    Earlier this month, Goldblatt ruled that Teamsters president Sean O’Brien could be deposed regarding the leadup to Yellow’s bankruptcy, which could be a factor in whether the estate must pay up the class-action claims.

    According to Yellow, letters and conversations between O’Brien and former Yellow CEO Darren Hawkins show that the trucking company had a reasonable basis to believe it could prove that the company is not liable for the WARN Act claims.

    The Teamsters represented 22,000 of Yellow’s roughly 30,000 employees when the company went under, with both parties blaming the other for the logistics firm’s demise.

    A trial will begin for the class-action suit in December at the earliest.

    Expand All
    Comments / 22
    Add a Comment
    Freddie Mcmillian
    5d ago
    how many years this goes back.10 15 20 years do you have a record of this.
    Superstar Rockstar
    5d ago
    Another corrupt company. But do we really know how sinister this company really was.
    View all comments
    YOU MAY ALSO LIKE
    Local News newsLocal News

    Comments / 0