Open in App
  • Local
  • U.S.
  • Election
  • Politics
  • Sports
  • Lifestyle
  • Education
  • Real Estate
  • Newsletter
  • StateCollege.com

    Judge Orders Hearing for State College Man Seeking to Overturn Decades-Old Murder Conviction

    By Geoff Rushton,

    19 hours ago

    https://img.particlenews.com/image.php?url=2UQ0j3_0vrvvEGz00

    A State College man who has spent the past 42 years in prison for a murder he says he did not commit is one step closer to getting a new trial.

    Centre County President Judge Jonathan Grine on Tuesday ordered an evidentiary hearing to determine if Subramanyam "Subu" Vedam should get a new trial for the 1980 murder of Thomas Kinser.

    Vedam was convicted in 1983 and again at retrial in 1988 after prosecutors said he used a .25 caliber gun to kill Kinser. The murder weapon was never recovered, and Vedam's conviction was based in part on his purchase of a .25 caliber gun.

    But Vedam's attorneys say a newly discovered FBI report was suppressed by the Centre County District Attorney's Office at the time of his trial and shows that the bullet hole in Kinser's skull was too small to have been made by a .25.

    The report only came to light after Vedam's attorneys were granted access to the full case file and found a handwritten note with the size of the bullet hole, believed to have been written by former Centre County DA Ray Gricar, who prosecuted the 1988 retrial. The DA's office then requested from the FBI and provided to Vedam's attorneys the full report earlier this year.

    Vedam's team also claims the report shows prosecution suppressed data generated by an FBI Comparative Bullet Lead Analysis conducted on a test-fire bullet and a bullet found at the Bear Meadows sinkhole where Kinser's remains were found in September 1981. An FBI agent who testified at trial did not mention that the underlying data demonstrated that the two bullets were not a match.

    Both claims, Grine wrote, are "genuine issues of material fact" that warrant a hearing.

    "At trial, the defense outlined its theory from the outset that a key question was whether the Commonwealth was correct that the .25 caliber gun owned by Petitioner was really the weapon used to murder Kinser," Grine wrote. "Large portions of the testimony at trial revolved around the size of the bullet that killed the victim."

    In seeking to have the claims dismissed, the Centre County District Attorney's Office has argued that the evidence against Vedam was overwhelming, and the size of the hole would not undermine the case.

    Grine did dismiss several other claims brought by Vedam, including that the prosecution withheld the actual murder weapon and a search warrant. There is no evidence, Grine wrote, that the murder weapon was ever recovered, nor that the search warrant application in question was ever adopted or executed.

    He also dismissed claims that witness interview transcripts, a sketch showing several .22 caliber bullets at the scene where Kinser was found and the criminal history of a witness who claimed he sold Vedam a gun before Kinser was killed. Each of those have been previously litigated or could have been obtained in a timely manner with due diligence, Grine wrote.

    Vedam was 19 years old in the fall of 1980 and was the last known person to see his friend Kinser alive. Kinser’s body was discovered in September 1981 at Bear Meadows in Harris Township.

    Prosecutors contended that a .25-caliber bullet and bullet found among Kinser's remains matched a bullet casing found near where Vedam test-fired a .25 caliber gun when he bought it.

    A witness, whose credibility has been questioned by Vedam's new attorneys because of his extensive criminal history, testified that he sold the gun to Vedam before Kinser's disappearance. Vedam claims he bought it after Kinser disappeared.

    A Centre County jury convicted Vedam in February 1983 and has been imprisoned at SCI-Huntingdon since then. On appeal state Superior Court, remanded the case for a new trial and Vedam was convicted again in February 1988.

    He has maintained his innocence and in the intervening years has sought post-conviction relief.

    In August 2021, attorneys led by Gopal Balachandran, a Penn State Law professor and State College Borough Councilman, began pursuing a conviction integrity review and worked with Centre County District Attorney to review the full case files.

    Vedam's attorneys and prosecutors were most recently in court in July to present arguments on the request for an evidentiary hearing.

    No date has been set for the hearing. A status conference is scheduled for Oct. 15 to determine the length of the hearing.

    Additional reporting by Russell Frank.

    PREVIOUS COVERAGE

    Life in Prison: It’s Not a Nice Place to Visit and You Wouldn’t Want to Live There

    Subu’s Story (Part 2)

    A Mother Dies Without Seeing Her Son Go Free

    It’s Time to Give Lifers a Chance at Life

    New Hope for Subu Vedam

    After 42 Years, Another Day in Court for Subu Vedam

    No Decision Yet on Subu Vedam’s Plea for a New Trial

    The post Judge Orders Hearing for State College Man Seeking to Overturn Decades-Old Murder Conviction appeared first on StateCollege.com .

    Expand All
    Comments / 1
    Add a Comment
    Chris Potalivo
    15h ago
    Determination of bullet caliber becomes increasingly important in homicides where the bullet is missing. In cases with entrance wounds to bone that are circular and well defined it may be tempting to measure the defect and offer suggestions about bullet caliber. For this reason, the relationship between wound diameter and bullet caliber was examined using cranial bones from autopsy cases. The minimum diameter of 35 cranial wounds produced by .22, .25, and .38-caliber bullet was measured. The relationship of minimum wound diameter to bullet caliber was examined using a one way analysis of variance. Fisher's least significant difference test revealed no significant difference between .22-caliber and .25-caliber wounds, while the .38-caliber wounds were significantly different (P < .001) from .22-caliber and .25-caliber wounds. Variation in wound size resulting from such factors as bullet shape, surface treatment, strength characteristics, loss of gyroscopic stability, intermediate targets, tangential impacts, and existing fractures are discussed. Also, the large variety of calibers available are noted as complicating the prediction of caliber from wound size. In view of these factors caution is recommended in any attempt to determine precise bullet caliber from the minimum dimensions of the cranial gunshot entrance wound.
    View all comments
    YOU MAY ALSO LIKE
    Local News newsLocal News
    Robert Russell Shaneyfelt11 days ago
    The Shenandoah (PA) Sentinel26 days ago
    Robert Russell Shaneyfelt24 days ago
    Robert Russell Shaneyfelt13 days ago

    Comments / 0