Soaring housing prices are causing Americans to rethink their “dream home” and “dream workspace,” where luxury is out and practicality is in.
A new poll of 2,000 U.S. adults found 58% have witnessed increased housing costs over the past five years, and 39% frequently feel like they’re stuck living where they are.
Many are also concerned about the affordability of housing (50%), crime (40%) and making home repairs (35%).
Commissioned by Built , the construction and real estate finance technology company, and conducted by Talker Research, the study found Americans currently spend 25% of their monthly income on housing, but would ideally like to spend 19%.
The average prospective homebuyer would need mortgage interest rates to be lowered down to at least 4% before they consider moving to a new house, and 42% would likely consider moving if they were incentivized by a destination’s local programs to buy or build a home there.
Today, 43% of Americans polled rent their homes, while 57% own their homes.
Nearly half (49%) of renters said they prefer renting, though 47% said they’d like to own a home someday — 17% of whom would like to own a home within the next 18 months.
In fact, one-third frequently think about their “dream home,” as well as their “dream workspace.”
“Rising costs are causing people to really rethink what’s actually important to them,” said Tanner Dieterich, head of owner and contractor relations at Built. “If you look back just a few years, people wanted pools and home theaters.”
“Now, data shows they prefer practicality—a minimalist approach that still ensures a good quality of life. But for that to happen, we need to address what’s preventing people from moving in the first place.”
The survey found exactly what Americans are looking for in an ideal home and workspace amid the new era of hybrid work models and an increasing cost of living.
The ideal "dream home" is an average of 2,402 square feet, with 69% of respondents preferring a single-family dwelling over a multi-family building, condo, or townhouse.
Americans also want simple, practical features and amenities like central air conditioning and heating (68%), easy-to-access laundry appliances (55%), a yard or green space (55%) and nearby local amenities (54%).
This beat out more “traditional” ideas of luxury living — having a pool (37%), professional-grade cooking equipment and appliances (32%), manicured landscaping (32%), gym (29%), home theater (28%), greenhouse (24%) and au-pair suits (15%).
A large majority of remote workers (88%) and office workers (71%) agree their workspaces should make them feel comfortable.
Whether it’s at home or in an office, a “dream workspace” has ample natural sunlight (61%), space (55%) and parking (25%).
And if a commute is required, people want features they wouldn’t otherwise have at home: natural light (40%), nearby restaurants and cafés (33%), quiet rooms (33%), dedicated or assigned working spaces (32%) and break rooms (31%). In other words, an office ought to provide what a home office cannot.
With so many dream list items to cross off, it’s not surprising that Americans are yearning for greener pastures. The study found that currently, more than one in five (22%) would give where they live an “A” and 18% would give their place of work a “B”. Both the home and the workplace earned a “B” for amenities and features, however (21% and 19%, respectively).
“Almost 50% of people aspire to homeownership — yet, affordability and available housing remain the primary obstacles,” Dieterich explained. “Once these issues have been addressed, individuals can begin to truly envision their ideal homes and workplaces.”
Survey methodology:
Talker Research surveyed 2,000 general population Americans ; the survey was commissioned by Built and administered and conducted online by Talker Research between July 4 and July 8, 2024.
We are sourcing from a non-probability frame and the two main sources we use are:
Traditional online access panels — where respondents opt-in to take part in online market research for an incentive
Programmatic — where respondents are online and are given the option to take part in a survey to receive a virtual incentive usually related to the online activity they are engaging in
Those who did not fit the specified sample were terminated from the survey. As the survey is fielded, dynamic online sampling is used, adjusting targeting to achieve the quotas specified as part of the sampling plan.
Regardless of which sources a respondent came from, they were directed to an Online Survey, where the survey was conducted in English; a link to the questionnaire can be shared upon request. Respondents were awarded points for completing the survey. These points have a small cash-equivalent monetary value.
Cells are only reported on for analysis if they have a minimum of 80 respondents, and statistical significance is calculated at the 95% level. Data is not weighted, but quotas and other parameters are put in place to reach the desired sample.
Interviews are excluded from the final analysis if they failed quality-checking measures. This includes:
Speeders: Respondents who complete the survey in a time that is quicker than one-third of the median length of interview are disqualified as speeders
Open ends: All verbatim responses (full open-ended questions as well as other please specify options) are checked for inappropriate or irrelevant text
Bots: Captcha is enabled on surveys, which allows the research team to identify and disqualify bots
Duplicates: Survey software has “deduping” based on digital fingerprinting, which ensures nobody is allowed to take the survey more than once
It is worth noting that this survey was only available to individuals with internet access, and the results may not be generalizable to those without internet access.
Get updates delivered to you daily. Free and customizable.
It’s essential to note our commitment to transparency:
Our Terms of Use acknowledge that our services may not always be error-free, and our Community Standards emphasize our discretion in enforcing policies. As a platform hosting over 100,000 pieces of content published daily, we cannot pre-vet content, but we strive to foster a dynamic environment for free expression and robust discourse through safety guardrails of human and AI moderation.
Comments / 0