Open in App
  • Local
  • Headlines
  • Election
  • Sports
  • Lifestyle
  • Education
  • Real Estate
  • Newsletter
  • Tampa Bay Times

    Florida Supreme Court justices reject abortion information case

    By News Service of Florida,

    17 hours ago
    https://img.particlenews.com/image.php?url=3v1rZ3_0w3VL08000
    The Florida Supreme Court rejected a petition that alleged that top state officials have improperly tried to interfere with the abortion amendment on November ballots. [ CARLINE JEAN | South Florida Sun-Sentinel ]

    The Florida Supreme Court on Thursday unanimously rejected a petition filed by a Palm Beach County attorney alleging that top state officials have improperly tried to interfere with a November referendum on abortion rights.

    Adam Richardson, of Lake Worth, filed the petition Sept. 10 amid a controversy about an Agency for Health Care Administration webpage and video public service announcement about abortion issues.

    While the agency contended the information presented facts, critics said it was biased against a ballot measure, known as Amendment 4, that seeks to enshrine abortion rights in the state Constitution.

    Richardson, in part, asked the Supreme Court to issue what is known as a writ of quo warranto to Agency for Health Care Administration Secretary Jason Weida, Gov. Ron DeSantis and Moody “forbidding them from misusing or abusing their offices to interfere with the election for Amendment 4, and to unravel whatever actions they have already taken to do so.”

    The Supreme Court’s main opinion, written by Justice John Couriel, said quo warranto cases have been used to question whether state officials have improperly exercised their power. But the opinion said Richardson’s petition did not follow legal precedent, in part because it was based on a criminal law that limits political activities of government officials.

    “For one thing, we have never held that the writ lies to compel the criminal prosecution of a state actor or to enable a private citizen to enforce a state criminal statute,” Couriel wrote. “It is hard to see how he asks us to do anything short of that, for the statute is express about what a violation of its requirements constitutes: ‘a misdemeanor of the first degree.’”

    Chief Justice Carlos Muniz and Justices Charles Canady, Jamie Grosshans and Meredith Sasso joined the opinion. Judge Renatha Francis wrote a concurring opinion, and Judge Jorge Labarga concurred in the result of the main opinion.

    • • •

    Tampa Bay Times Election Coverage

    2024 general election voter guide: Over 90 local candidates on the issues: Here’s who’s running for office and their stances on abortion, immigration, local schools and more.

    Why Florida Democrats should be optimistic — and why they should be pessimistic: For the first time in a while, Democrats seem to have some juice. Is it real?

    Here are the 6 amendments Floridians will vote on in November: The proposals relate to abortion, marijuana, hunting and fishing and more.

    Florida’s Amendment 1, explained: Partisan school board elections will appear on the ballot this election.

    How Florida’s Amendment 2 could affect hunting and fishing: The constitutional right to fish and hunt will appear on the ballot.

    Amendment 3: Florida’s recreational marijuana ballot measure, explained.

    5 Tampa Bay congressional races are set. Here’s who’s running.

    If Florida votes for abortion, marijuana, will lawmakers abide? The two amendments are opposed by Florida’s Republican leaders.

    Expand All
    Comments / 2
    Add a Comment
    Natalie Collins
    19m ago
    SCOTUS has to be purchased for them to review a case….. impeach them all!
    VOTE HARRIS/WALZ🇺🇸💙💙🇺🇸
    19m ago
    Fuck off. VOTE BLUE
    View all comments
    YOU MAY ALSO LIKE
    Local News newsLocal News

    Comments / 0