NYT Connections today — hints and answers for Thursday, October 10 (game #487)
By Marc McLaren,
8 hours ago
Good morning! Let's play Connections, the NYT's clever word game that challenges you to group answers in various categories. It can be tough, so read on if you need clues.
SPOILER WARNING: Information about NYT Connections today is below, so don't read on if you don't want to know the answers.
NYT Connections today (game #487) - today's words
Today's NYT Connections words are…
HIP
TEA
BIG
BAD
EYE
FLY
SEW
SAW
ILL
FAR
ELF
LEG
HER
RAD
ARM
DOE
NYT Connections today (game #487) - hint #1 - group hints
What are some clues for today's NYT Connections groups?
Yellow: Ear could be another
Green: Dope words
Blue: Films
Purple: All feature in a popular musical song
Need more clues?
We're firmly in spoiler territory now, but read on if you want to know what the four theme answers are for today's NYT Connections puzzles…
NYT Connections today (game #487) - hint #2 - group answers
What are the answers for today's NYT Connections groups?
YELLOW: BODY PARTS
GREEN: COOL, IN ’80S SLANG
BLUE: MOVIES
PURPLE: WORDS IN “DO-RE-MI”
Right, the answers are below, so DO NOT SCROLL ANY FURTHER IF YOU DON'T WANT TO SEE THEM.
NYT Connections today (game #487) - the answers
The answers to today's Connections, game #487, are…
YELLOW: BODY PARTS ARM, EYE, HIP, LEG
GREEN: COOL, IN ’80S SLANG BAD, FLY, ILL, RAD
BLUE: MOVIES BIG, ELF, HER, SAW
PURPLE: WORDS IN “DO-RE-MI” DOE, FAR, SEW, TEA
My rating: Easy
My score: Perfect
As a child of the ‘80s I was delighted to see COOL, IN ’80S SLANG appear as a group today – although I’ll be honest and admit that I was never cool enough to say words like BAD, FLY, ILL or RAD myself very often. But I’ve watched enough ‘80s movies that they’re still in my mind, so solving this one wasn’t too tricky.
In fact, none of today’s four groups were particularly challenging. That didn’t appear to be the case when I loaded up the game, though: it was one of those days where all of the words are really short. In fact, all 16 of them were three-letter words, and though that doesn’t itself make a game hard, there was a strong possibility that some might be prefixes or suffixes, and that can make things tougher.
That wasn’t the case, though. MOVIES was another theme (with ELF, SAW, HER and BIG the answers), while the yellow BODY PARTS group was one of the easiest we’ve ever had in Connections. It was all much simpler than I anticipated, thankfully.
Yesterday's NYT Connections answers (Wednesday, 9 October, game #486)
YELLOW: EFFERVESCENCE BUBBLES, FIZZ, FOAM, FROTH
GREEN: BURGEON BLOSSOM, DEVELOP, MATURE, PROGRESS
BLUE: MUSIC PUBLICATIONS BILLBOARD, MOJO, PITCHFORK, SPIN
PURPLE: ENDING WITH TABLEWARE BOILERPLATE, BUTTERCUP, JACKKNIFE, WITHERSPOON
What is NYT Connections?
NYT Connections is one of several increasingly popular word games made by the New York Times. It challenges you to find groups of four items that share something in common, and each group has a different difficulty level: green is easy, yellow a little harder, blue often quite tough and purple usually very difficult.
On the plus side, you don't technically need to solve the final one, as you'll be able to answer that one by a process of elimination. What's more, you can make up to four mistakes, which gives you a little bit of breathing room.
It's a little more involved than something like Wordle, however, and there are plenty of opportunities for the game to trip you up with tricks. For instance, watch out for homophones and other word games that could disguise the answers.
It's playable for free via the NYT Games site on desktop or mobile.
Get updates delivered to you daily. Free and customizable.
It’s essential to note our commitment to transparency:
Our Terms of Use acknowledge that our services may not always be error-free, and our Community Standards emphasize our discretion in enforcing policies. As a platform hosting over 100,000 pieces of content published daily, we cannot pre-vet content, but we strive to foster a dynamic environment for free expression and robust discourse through safety guardrails of human and AI moderation.
Comments / 0