Open in App
  • Local
  • U.S.
  • Election
  • Politics
  • Sports
  • Lifestyle
  • Education
  • Real Estate
  • Newsletter
  • Texoma's Homepage

    Texas sues feds in Lubbock, challenging privacy for abortions and more

    By Caitlyn Rooney,

    3 days ago

    https://img.particlenews.com/image.php?url=05dHGy_0vNlulJx00

    LUBBOCK, Texas — Texas on Wednesday sued the federal government in Lubbock, challenging a privacy law that the state said is meant to stop enforcement of abortion laws and restrictions on gender change procedures for minors.

    The lawsuit filed against the U.S Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) asked a U.S. District Judge to overturn the privacy rule and stop federal officials from enforcing it.

    Texas AG Paxton sues Democratic county that defied him on voter registration plan

    The HHS published the 2024 Privacy Rule on April 26. The rule, among other things, would prevent hospitals from handing over information to the state for criminal investigations related reproductive healthcare. The HHS has previously said the new rule is a response to the Supreme Court’s decision in Dobbs, which overturned Roe v. Wade.

    8 facing federal charges after ‘Project Safe Neighborhoods takedown’ in Lubbock

    A federal complaint filed by the State of Texas stated reproductive healthcare is “clearly” meant to include abortion, hormone and drug therapy for gender dysphoria and surgical procedures related to gender dysphoria and “gender experimentation.”

    “The 2024 Privacy Rule restricts state officials and law enforcement from obtaining evidence of a crime or other potential violation of state law,” court records stated.

    Is it illegal to harvest rainwater in Texas?

    The lawsuit said the information, if the federal rule stands, would fall into two categories:

    • To conduct a criminal, civil, or administrative investigation into any person for the mere act of seeking, obtaining, providing, or facilitating reproductive health care.
    • To impose criminal, civil, or administrative liability on any person for the mere act of seeking, obtaining, providing, or facilitating reproductive health care.

    Texas claimed this information could be released to defend against lawsuits or criminal charges, but not to prosecute them.

    Judge denies Texas attorney general’s efforts to depose head of migrant advocacy group

    “This new rule actively undermines Congress’s clear statutory meaning when HIPAA was passed, and it reflects the Biden Administration’s disrespect for the law,” Attorney General Paxton said in a statement. “The federal government is attempting to undermine Texas’s law enforcement capabilities, and I will not allow this to happen.”

    Federal officials have not yet responded in court records.

    Kress school employee under investigation for alleged ‘improper conduct’ with student

    Office of Civil Rights Director Melanie Fontes Rainer stated previous press release from the federal government that the new rule “prohibits the use of protected health information for seeking or providing lawful reproductive health care and helps maintain and improve patient-provider trust that will lead to improved health outcomes and protect patient privacy.”

    Rainer also said the rule was meant to protect access to safe and legal healthcare.

    Close

    Thanks for signing up!

    Watch for us in your inbox.

    Daily News

    Copyright 2024 Nexstar Media Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

    For the latest news, weather, sports, and streaming video, head to Texomashomepage.com.

    Expand All
    Comments / 1
    Add a Comment
    NOYB MIND YOURS
    2d ago
    POLITICS "GAME!"
    View all comments
    YOU MAY ALSO LIKE
    Local News newsLocal News
    Texoma's Homepage2 days ago
    Texoma's Homepage2 days ago
    The Shenandoah (PA) Sentinel3 days ago

    Comments / 0