Opinion: Developing Ed Tech With a Focus on Students, Teachers and the Research

I have never been so aware of the lack of evidence-based tools and resources to serve student needs as when I worked in the central office of a New Orleans school district following Hurricane Katrina in 2005. I looked at many curricular and professional learning options, but high-quality, evidence-backed products were extremely limited. We were at the mercy of the market, which at the time offered little to no support to serve the range of needs of students experiencing poverty.

In today’s educational landscape, research and development is essential to driving progress and innovation in pre-K-12 teaching and learning. Yet, the dominant approach continues to revolve around market-driven solutions that are developed without evidence or teacher input. Unlike industries such as health care and energy, where there is seamless integration between scientific discovery and practical application, education often lacks a formal process that bases investments in tools and solutions on scientific investigation and proof of effectiveness. This fragmentation in R&D leads to inefficiencies, wasted funds on solutions that do not serve most students and missed opportunities for innovation that can improve learning gains.

In health care, the efficacy of a new treatment or medication must be rigorously demonstrated before it can reach real-world practice. In education, research should similarly align with the practical needs of students and educators to ensure that solutions work and genuinely help all those they are intended to impact. This trajectory from initial scientific breakthrough to classroom application demands rigorous measurement, evaluation and feedback. It requires a commitment to exploring, making mistakes and always improving without sacrificing a dedication to positive change. And it requires meaningful and frequent input from the people who will use these innovative solutions — starting at the beginning.

Get stories like these delivered straight to your inbox. Sign up for The 74 Newsletter

As chief learning officer at the Advanced Education Research and Development Fund , I have seen first-hand the real impact that systemic change and student-centered and research-based design of educational technology can make. Understanding the experiences of students, caregivers and educators is essential to staying learner-focused from the outset, especially because caregivers hold dreams for their children’s futures and teachers know what young people’s academic needs are. Involving researchers, developers and policymakers from the beginning makes it possible to identify the right opportunities and help design solutions that align with the needs of all students. Then, when a promising innovation takes shape, it’s essential to bring in industry experts and investors who can provide the financial backing for an expansion from a single classroom or school.

The need for innovative solutions to help students recover from pandemic learning disruptions has never been more urgent. The nation needs all hands on deck — educator and community engagement, high ethical standards for ed tech and importantly, federal investment in education R&D. Here are four key criteria that teachers, administrators and those purchasing education technology and curriculum for their districts should look for:

• A strong focus on both scientific evidence and real-world experience is essential in building new solutions for the future. Educators should talk with colleagues about what has worked for them in supporting student learning and improving classroom practice, and engage expertise from many sources — fellow teachers, administrators, industry experts, researchers and policymakers.
  
• Look for products that were created using expert insights from educators, researchers and product developers, based on how students learn best. These should include diverse perspectives to ensure the technology is accessible to students who are disproportionately impacted by poverty. Ask questions about where the product was piloted, in what types of schools, in what geographic locations, with which demographic and socioeconomic groups — and look for evidence of positive impact.
  
• Does the product foster inclusivity, equity and transparency? Does it serve the best interests of all the students involved while treating each as an individual? Does it ensure data privacy, is it accessible and does it offer diverse content? Will it work in rural areas and in large, diverse cities? These are key ethical questions to consider.
  
• Teachers lack the time and bandwidth to spend their valuable time navigating how to move in and out of each ed tech tool. New products need to work in concert with one another interoperably and mesh seamlessly with teacher workflows. They should not be just created inside a lab, but developed based on what works inside the classroom, with a lot of input from the people who will use them.

These four elements can change the way education solutions are developed, enabling faster, bigger breakthroughs that can benefit pre-K-12 teaching, learning and assessment systems.