Open in App
  • Local
  • U.S.
  • Election
  • Politics
  • Sports
  • Lifestyle
  • Education
  • Real Estate
  • Newsletter
  • The 74

    New Hampshire Appealing Federal Court Decision Against ‘Banned Concepts’ Law

    By Ethan DeWitt,

    2024-07-29
    https://img.particlenews.com/image.php?url=3ugVAU_0ugiLyTA00

    This article was originally published in New Hampshire Bulletin.

    Months after a federal court held that a 2021 state law regulating how teachers address race, gender, and other topics was unconstitutional , New Hampshire’s Attorney General’s Office has filed an appeal.

    In a filing to the First Circuit Court of Appeals in Boston announced Wednesday, the office argued that the U.S. District Court of New Hampshire was wrong to rule that the state law is unconstitutionally vague.

    “The court applied the vagueness doctrine in a way that improperly second guesses the legitimate policy choices made by the State Legislature in setting curriculum within New Hampshire’s public schools,” read a press release by the Department of Justice Wednesday.


    Get stories like these delivered straight to your inbox. Sign up for The 74 Newsletter


    The case centers around a law, known to opponents as the “divisive concepts” or “banned concepts” law, that restricts teachers and other public employees from certain teaching topics and lays out professional consequences – including lawsuits and the potential loss of their teaching credentials – if they are found to have violated the law.

    Under the law, teachers and government employees are not allowed to advocate that people of one race, gender, or other characteristic are inherently superior to or advantaged over others; that people of one characteristic are inherently oppressive toward others; that an individual should be discriminated against or receive adverse treatment for any characteristic; and that people “cannot and should not attempt to treat others without regard to” their characteristics. The law, labeled the Right to Freedom from Discrimination in Public Workplaces and Education, allows parents to file lawsuits against school districts if they believe teachers are violating the law, and allows them to file complaints with the New Hampshire Commission for Human Rights.

    If a teacher is found by a court or the commission to have violated the law, the State Board of Education can take disciplinary action and potentially rescind their teachers license.

    So far since the law’s passage as part of the 2021 budget, only one complaint has been brought forward, according to the Attorney General’s Office. But teachers unions and the American Civil Liberties Union say that because the prohibitions in the law are not clear, and because the professional consequences are so severe, the law has had a chilling effect on teachers who feel they cannot have nuanced discussions on race or gender.

    After two teachers’ unions, the American Federation of Teachers of New Hampshire and National Education Association of New Hampshire, sued the state in conjunction with the ACLU of New Hampshire and LGBTQ Legal Advocates & Defenders, Judge Paul Barbadoro ruled in May that the law violated teachers’ 14th Amendment rights because it was unconstitutionally vague. That vagueness applied to both the way in which teachers might interpret the law and the way in which state officials might choose to punish teachers under the law, he ruled.

    “… Because the Amendments fail to establish ‘minimal guidelines to govern [their] enforcement,’ officials are free to ‘pursue their personal predilections’ when applying the law,” Barbadoro wrote.

    Barbadoro’s ruling struck down the law; the state is now seeking to restore it through the appeal.

    “Today’s decision to appeal this misguided ruling underscores our commitment to upholding the right of duly elected legislators to enact carefully considered policy and clarity in our state laws,” Attorney General John Formella said in a statement Wednesday. “… This case is not just about legal technicalities; it’s about safeguarding the integrity of our legislative process and ensuring clarity and stability for our educators, students, and communities across New Hampshire.”

    Oral arguments in the appeal in Boston are “expected to occur in the coming months,” the press release continued.

    New Hampshire Bulletin is part of States Newsroom, a nonprofit news network supported by grants and a coalition of donors as a 501c(3) public charity. New Hampshire Bulletin maintains editorial independence. Contact Editor Dana Wormald for questions: info@newhampshirebulletin.com . Follow New Hampshire Bulletin on Facebook and X .

    Expand All
    Comments / 16
    Add a Comment
    Stephan Cooper
    07-30
    I don't understand the law writing saying anything about not teaching history or about slavory or anything that was done in the past that happened and we learned from and now should teach the future generations our mistakes from the past that we learned from and although was excepted at that time is no longer excepted today u can't grow or learn to be better without knowing and learning from mistakes from the past but the way I read this bill or law isn't that history or the mistakes we made in the past can't be taught or talked about but that it can't be taught that mistakes we made in the past and learned from was wrong and that nobody is better or right from another unless that person is a pice of shit racist so I don't understand the problem with this law or y anyone wouldn't want it in the first place
    everybody sucks 2024
    07-29
    so....are we not teaching history the way it happened or are we just white washing it. it is ok to teach people that noone is better or less than another....but they need to know WHY they are being taught that.
    View all comments
    YOU MAY ALSO LIKE
    Local News newsLocal News
    The Shenandoah (PA) Sentinel26 days ago

    Comments / 0