Get updates delivered to you daily. Free and customizable.
THE CITY
NYCHA Residents in Coney Island Reject Move to Nonprofit Trust Fund
By Greg B. Smith,
4 days ago
Tenants of the Coney Island Houses on Friday dealt a hit to Mayor Eric Adams’ hopes for a solution to public housing woes, rejecting a new funding scheme he has repeatedly trumpeted as the answer to NYCHA’s never-ending financial struggles.
Residents of the 66-year-old development at the far end of Coney Island turned thumbs down to a proposal to remove the development from traditional public housing funding and move it into a nonprofit “preservation trust” that would expand the Housing Authority’s ability to float bonds for much-needed repairs.
The preliminary count of a vote that began last month and ended Thursday showed 239 tenants voted against the trust plan, opting instead to stick with public housing funding known as Section 9 — essentially choosing a status quo that has been criticized for years as being inadequate to address NYCHA’s many failures .
In contrast, only 125 tenants embraced moving into the trust. Another 42 voted in favor of a public-private partnership program known as Rental Assistance Demonstration (RAD), in which the authority retains ownership of properties but turns over management to private-sector developers.
The total number of votes comes to 402, about 40% of the Coney Island Houses 1,040 residents. The vote required at least 20% of households to participate; 57% of households cast a vote.
The count of votes made as of Thursday either on-line, by mail or in person is preliminary, with mail-in ballots postmarked by yesterday still to count, but the result is unlikely to change.
The rejection of the trust by NYCHA residents is a first. Three other developments have signed up in the past few months.
And on Friday, a smaller development next to Coney Island Houses known as Unity Towers also embraced the trust. (The vote there was 106 for the trust, 71 to remain in Section 9, and 11 to enter the RAD program).
The look to the trust to solve NYCHA’s problems comes as the authority’s management claim they need $78 billion to bring the city’s public housing portfolio of 161,000 apartments up to required health and safety standards. NYCHA is currently under the watch of an independent federal monitor after years of press reports and an investigation by the Manhattan U.S. attorney documenting how for years the authority had covered up lead paint, toxic mold and other scurrilous apartment conditions.
Last year, with Adams’ lobbying hard, state legislators approved allowing NYCHA to adopt the trust program that allows the authority to float billions of dollars in bonds to pay for a long list of needed upgrades to aging buildings that have long suffered neglect. Nearly two-thirds of NYCHA’s properties are at least 60 years old.
THE CITY reached out to City Hall seeking comment from Adams on the Coney Island vote. Liz Garcia, a spokesperson for the mayor, stated, “As the Adams administration has made clear, we want every NYCHA resident to be able to make their voices heard about the future of their housing, which is exactly what the residents at Coney Island Houses were able to do. We urge all eligible NYCHA residents to participate in voting and create the change they may want to see.”
In a statement released after the vote, NYCHA CEO Lisa Bova-Hiatt ignored Coney Island’s negative assessment of the trust, focusing instead on the significant tenant turnout and the votes by residents at Nostrand, Bronx River and Unity Towers to join the trust.
“Building off the success of Nostrand Houses and Bronx River Addition, NYCHA is excited to see the tremendous participation and turnout for the resident votes in Coney Island,” she said. “While the vote is not yet final and additional mail-in votes will be counted next week, we are thrilled there has been such robust engagement at both developments.”
Get updates delivered to you daily. Free and customizable.
It’s essential to note our commitment to transparency:
Our Terms of Use acknowledge that our services may not always be error-free, and our Community Standards emphasize our discretion in enforcing policies. As a platform hosting over 100,000 pieces of content published daily, we cannot pre-vet content, but we strive to foster a dynamic environment for free expression and robust discourse through safety guardrails of human and AI moderation.
Comments / 0