Class action filed against Neutrogena for falsely advertising makeup wipes as plant-based
8 hours ago
CALIFORNIA – Plaintiff Chelsea Garland filed a class action lawsuit, October 7, against Johnson & Johnson, in a California federal court, for falsely advertising its Neutrogena Makeup Remover Towelettes as plant-based.
According to the plaintiff’s attorneys, by 2023 the plant-based skincare market was worth $789.75 million and is projected to grow to $1.62 billion in the next 10 years.
They claim that in response to consumers’ desire for plant-based and natural products, many companies, including Johnson & Johnson, have marketed their products as being natural, plant-based in order to capture this expanding market.
However, an analysis of ingredients in the Neutrogena towelettes reveals that the majority of them – 13 of 15 ingredients are synthetic, non-plant based ingredients.
The court document lists product ingredients that include decyl isostearate, isopropyl isostearate, dimethicone, isohexadecane, and hexylene glycol.
“Defendant is a sophisticated market participant and knows that consumers are willing to pay more for products that are plant-based because they are perceived as healthier alternatives to similar products that contain synthetic chemicals,” said the court document.
68% of US executives admit their companies are guilty of greenwashing
Greenwashing refers to the practice where companies make misleading or unsubstantiated claims about the environmental benefits of a product, service, or their overall practices.
Zippia.com says 68% of US executives admit their companies are guilty of greenwashing. Many top companies, including Volkswagen and Starbucks, are guilty of greenwashing.
Volkswagen owes over $33 billion in fines due to greenwashing.
The class action against Johnson & Johnson calls attention to the Federal Trade Commission’s (FTC) Green Guides help marketers avoid deceptive environmental claims.
“Among its examples, the Green Guides specifically call out “plant-based” claims stating that “[m]arketers… are responsible for substantiating consumers’ reasonable understanding of …. “plant-based,” in the context of their advertisements.”
The plaintiff’s attorneys are arguing that the inclusion of the term "plant-based" in the Green Guides shows that this term is important, or material, to consumers. This means that "plant-based" claims are significant enough to influence a reasonable consumer's purchasing decision.
Class action
Garland wants to represent a nationwide class and California class of consumers who bought the Neutrogena Makeup Remover Towelettes during the statute of limitations periods.
She is asking for a jury trial and wants the court to issue a formal decision on the case, stop the company from continuing the false advertising, and pay money as compensation.
Get updates delivered to you daily. Free and customizable.
It’s essential to note our commitment to transparency:
Our Terms of Use acknowledge that our services may not always be error-free, and our Community Standards emphasize our discretion in enforcing policies. As a platform hosting over 100,000 pieces of content published daily, we cannot pre-vet content, but we strive to foster a dynamic environment for free expression and robust discourse through safety guardrails of human and AI moderation.