Get updates delivered to you daily. Free and customizable.
The Independent
Clapping for NHS during pandemic ‘dangerous’, ombudsman claims
By Sam Hall,
1 day ago
Britain’s Prime Minister Boris Johnson applauds outside 10 Downing Street during the Clap for our Carers REUTERS
Clapping for the NHS during the Covid pandemic may have been dangerous because “no organisation can be a national religion”, the health service ombudsman has said.
Ms Hilsenrath has submitted evidence to an investigation into the NHS led by Professor Lord Darzi.
Evidence submitted to the investigation, and shared with The Telegraph, show 27,479 complaints about the NHS in England to the Ombudsman in 2023/24. Of those which were fully investigated, two thirds (67%) were upheld in 2023/2024.
Commenting on the rise in complaints from 18,727 received in 2020/21, Ms Hilsenrath said: “I think it does speak to a change in attitude towards the NHS and a far lower degree of happiness with services.
“Of course, people were enormously grateful for the extraordinary efforts that people in NHS went to during that time, including risking their own personal safety.
“I also know that the national mood has changed since then, and I think it’s incredibly difficult as an NHS worker to consistently read about the failings in your service, and how you’re letting people down.”
The health service ombudsman continued: “There is an argument I have heard that clapping for the NHS during the pandemic was quite a dangerous thing to do … because no organisation can be a national religion, and no organisation should be beyond constructive criticism.
“I don’t think that it is helpful for any organisation to be treated as religion.”
Ms Hilsenrath said there was “a lack of consistency” in the NHS, adding that “the ultimate price for failure is tragedy”.
Staff from Queen Elizabeth University Hospital in Glasgow gather as they join in the applause during a nationwide Clap for Carer (PA) (PA Archive)
She said: “An NHS that isn’t listening isn’t learning, and that’s what takes you into repeat behaviours, and that’s the single critical thing that we see. And I’m afraid we see it over and over again.
“When big things go wrong and terrible things happen you get the NHS saying ‘never again’, but actually it’s just not true.
“Being patient-centric lies at the heart of that, because until the NHS listens more with people when things go wrong and before they go wrong, of course, those mistakes will continue to be made.”
Ms Hilsenrath said the regulatory landscape was in “urgent need of reform”, adding there was a “vast amount of duplication”.
She said: “It’s very difficult for regulators in health to speak with a clear and united voice, because there’s just so many of them, and they all have slightly different but overlapping roles.
“The organisations in question, the NHS, tend to get faced by multiple recommendations which all come from different people, and … of course, it’s a grossly inefficient way to run anything.”
A Department of Health and Social Care spokesperson said: “The NHS is broken but we are determined to get it back on its feet so it can be there for all of us when we need it.
“We will be honest about the challenges facing the health service and will work to tackle them.
“The independent investigation into the NHS by Lord Darzi is a step towards identifying and solving these problems as we create an NHS fit for the future.”
This article was amended on 29 August 2024. It originally stated that there were 27,479 complaints about the NHS in England to the Ombudsman in 2023/24, with two in three at least partly upheld. But that was inaccurate. It should have said that of those which were fully investigated, two thirds were upheld.
Get updates delivered to you daily. Free and customizable.
It’s essential to note our commitment to transparency:
Our Terms of Use acknowledge that our services may not always be error-free, and our Community Standards emphasize our discretion in enforcing policies. As a platform hosting over 100,000 pieces of content published daily, we cannot pre-vet content, but we strive to foster a dynamic environment for free expression and robust discourse through safety guardrails of human and AI moderation.
Comments / 0