Fury vs Usyk 2 will take place in Saudi Arabia, which staged the first clash, while Joshua vs Dubois tops a Saudi-staged card in London. It was already expected that the winners of those fights could face each other next, but Al-Sheikh provided more clarity on Monday (2 September).
He told talkSPORT that the result of Fury vs Usyk 2 will be irrelevant in grander plans to make the long-awaited Joshua vs Fury fight – although AJ must seemingly beat Dubois to ensure he faces the Gypsy King next.
“For the business, of course, it will be a huge fight if Joshua wins,” Al-Sheikh said. “His third time [winning] a world title and [after] the result of Usyk vs Fury, it will be a huge fight. But you don’t know about the future.
“Imagine Tyson, after the fight with Usyk, wants to retire. I will give him the offer, but if he refuses, what can I do? If Usyk wins, still I want to see Fury vs Joshua, if they accept.
“I will not try to do the third fight [between Usyk and Joshua] before having Fury vs Joshua [...] I want to see Fury vs Joshua and the world wants to see Fury vs Joshua.”
Anthony Joshua (left), Tyson Fury (top right) and Oleksandr Usyk (Getty Images)
Usyk, who holds two wins over Joshua and one over Dubois, outpointed Fury in May to retain the IBF, IBO, WBA and WBO titles, while taking the WBC belt from his opponent. However, the unbeaten Ukrainian – who dealt Fury his first loss as a professional – later relinquished the IBF belt .
As such, his rematch with Fury will not be for undisputed status. Meanwhile, Dubois became interim IBF champion by stopping Filip Hrgovic in June, before being upgraded to regular champion when Usyk vacated the official belt.
If Joshua beats Dubois this month, he will become a three-time world champion – having previously reigned as unified champion twice. Joshua’s second run as champion ended with a decision loss to Usyk in 2021, and the Ukrainian also won their rematch on points in 2022.
Get updates delivered to you daily. Free and customizable.
It’s essential to note our commitment to transparency:
Our Terms of Use acknowledge that our services may not always be error-free, and our Community Standards emphasize our discretion in enforcing policies. As a platform hosting over 100,000 pieces of content published daily, we cannot pre-vet content, but we strive to foster a dynamic environment for free expression and robust discourse through safety guardrails of human and AI moderation.
Comments / 0