Trump is “incorrect” to argue that he is not legally responsible for the attack, according to Smith, who points to his lengthy indictment and evidence that he says “plainly” shows that the former president summoned his supporters to Washington, DC, and directed them to march to the Capitol as part of a pressure campaign to overturn 2020’s election results.
He “willfully caused his supporters to obstruct and attempt to obstruct” a joint session of Congress, then gave them a “false hope” that Vice President Mike Pence would change the outcome, according to Wednesday’s filing.
A defendant “is criminally liable when he ‘willfully causes an act to be done which if directly performed by him or another would be’ a federal offense,” Smith notes.
The allegations against the former president “link the defendant’s actions on January 6 directly to his efforts to corruptly obstruct the certification proceeding,” according to the filing.
Smith’s team wrote in response to Trump’s latest attempt to have the case against him thrown out, pointing to a recent Supreme Court decision involving criminal prosecutions against rioters who were charged with obstruction.
That decision “expressly held” that a statute under which Trump is charged can still be applied in a case involving false evidence to obstruct the certification of election results, the filing notes.
Trump’s lawyers had previously argued that the indictment “stretches generally applicable statutes beyond their breaking point based on false claims that President Trump is somehow responsible” for the January 6 attack.
But Smith argues that the Supreme Court’s decision “did not invalidate” the statute under which Trump is charged, “and the defendant fails to identify any pleading flaw in the superseding indictment warranting its dismissal.”
Trump “ignores entirely that the case against him includes allegations that he and his co-conspirators sought to create and use false evidence — fraudulent electoral certificates — as a means of obstructing the certification proceeding,” Smith wrote.
“The defendant’s half-hearted arguments” against charges of criminal conspiracy “likewise lack merit,” he added.
The document outlines Trump’s “increasingly desperate” and criminal efforts to cling to power while relying on “knowingly false claims of election fraud,” according to prosecutors.
District Judge Tanya Chutkan granted Trump’s attorneys an extension to respond to the filing until after Election Day. His separate motion to dismiss the case reviving his presidential immunity arguments is due on November 7.
Comments / 166
Add a Comment
Adam Williams
21m ago
Our Osama Bin Laden!!!
guest
55m ago
kamalass bears responsibility for the summer riots of 2020 !
Get updates delivered to you daily. Free and customizable.
It’s essential to note our commitment to transparency:
Our Terms of Use acknowledge that our services may not always be error-free, and our Community Standards emphasize our discretion in enforcing policies. As a platform hosting over 100,000 pieces of content published daily, we cannot pre-vet content, but we strive to foster a dynamic environment for free expression and robust discourse through safety guardrails of human and AI moderation.