The Future of Journalism: California's Bill to Revolutionize Online News

Photo byAuthor Edit

The dominance of Big Tech has long been a thorn in the side of California's journalism industry, with giants like Google and Meta siphoning off advertising revenue and leaving news outlets to fight over scraps. As Google's former CEO Eric Schmidt once quipped, "We're in the business of making money, and if we can't make money, we can't make content." But what happens when the content creators can't make ends meet? 

Assembly Bill 886, the California Journalism Preservation Act, aims to turn the tables by forcing tech behemoths to pay news publishers for their content.

If passed, this groundbreaking legislation could revolutionize the way California's journalism industry operates, providing a vital lifeline to struggling news outlets and paving the way for a more sustainable future. By requiring tech platforms to compensate news publishers for their work, AB 886 has the potential to reshape the Golden State's media landscape, and perhaps even serve as a model for the nation.

The outcome in Canada serves as a case study for other countries considering similar legislation, highlighting the complex dynamics between tech giants, news organizations, and government regulation in the digital age. While there is a significant portion of the Canadian population that supports the Online News Act, there is also considerable opposition and concern about its implications, particularly regarding news access and the role of tech companies.

Assembly Bill 886 bill's supporters argue it will help counteract the monopolization of advertising revenue by tech platforms.

Key points of contention include:

• Payment requirements based on the number of journalists employed, rather than article impressions
• Opposition from tech giants citing increased operational costs and potential reduction of news content
• Amendments to support small publishers with additional funding and flexibility
• Eligibility criteria narrowed to journalists producing news for California audiences
• Arbitration mechanism for tech platforms to pay news publishers for content use
• Journalism usage fee payments calculated as a percentage of advertising revenue

The bill is part of a broader legislative effort to support journalism, with a separate bill proposing a tax on tech companies to fund news organizations. Journalism organizations have expressed support, while tech companies remain opposed.

Ongoing legislative negotiations are expected to bring further modifications. Major tech companies like Google have opposed the bill, arguing that it could lead to increased operational costs and potentially reduce the availability of news content on their platforms.

References:

• Statista. Public opinion on the Online News Act in Canada 2023. Statista.
• The Economist. (2024, May 16). Facebook turned off the news in Canada. What happened next? The Economist.
• California State Legislature. (2023-2024). AB-886 News publishers: digital platforms.
• Government of Canada. (n.d.). Online news.
• Los Angeles Times. (2024, June 10). California lawmakers revive debate over bill requiring tech platforms to pay for news. Los Angeles Times.
• Statista. (n.d.). Public support for the Online News Act in Canada 2023. Statista.