Jannik Sinner has escaped punishment after testing positive for a banned substance Getty Nick Kyrgios believes he should’ve received a two-year ban Getty
But World Anti-Doping Agency chiefs have not ruled out an appeal to the Court of Arbitration for Sport.
Aussie ace Kyrgios insisted the 23-year-old Italian should have been given a TWO-YEAR ban.
The 29-year-old stormed: “Ridiculous — whether it was accidental or planned. You get tested twice with a banned substance you should be gone for two years. Your performance was enhanced.”
A WADA statement read: “As we do with all cases, we will review this decision carefully and reserve the right to appeal to CAS, as appropriate.”
ITIA chief Karen Moorhouse said: “We take any positive test extremely seriously and will always apply the rigorous processes set out by WADA.
“The ITIA carried out a thorough investigation into the circumstances leading to the positive tests with which Mr Sinner and his representatives fully co-operated.
“Following that, the ITIA accepted the player’s explanation as to the source of the clostebol and that the presence of the substance was not intentional. This was also accepted by the tribunal.”
BEST FREE BET SIGN UP OFFERS FOR UK BOOKMAKER S
Sinner, who warmed up for this month’s US Open by winning the Cincinnati title on Monday, first tested positive on March 10 at Indian Wells.
He was red-flagged again in an out-of-competition test eight days later, with both samples showing clostebol.
But he was able to continue playing on the ATP Tour after successfully challenging a provisional suspension.
Experts consulted by the ITIA concluded Sinner’s account — in which his physio Giacomo Naldi had used an over-the-counter spray containing clostebol on his skin between March 5-13 — was credible.
The ITIA yesterday confirmed Sinner bears “no fault or negligence”, adding: “After each positive test, a provisional suspension was applied.
“On both occasions, Sinner successfully appealed the provisional suspension and so has been able to continue playing.
What have the players said?
Jannik Sinner: “I will continue to do everything I can to continue to comply with the ITIA’s anti-doping programme and I have a team around me that are meticulous in their own compliance.”
Nick Kyrgios: “Whether it was accidental or planned. You get tested twice with a banned (steroid) substance, you should be gone for 2 years. Your performance was enhanced.”
Denis Shapovalov: “[I] Can’t imagine what every other player that got banned for contaminated substances is feeling right now. Different rules for different players.”
Liam Broady: “Whether Sinner was doping or not. This is not right. Plenty of players go through the same thing and have to wait months or YEARS for their innocence to be declared. Not a good look.”
John Millman: “Before jumping to conclusions, Jannik Sinner had less than a billionth of a gram in his system.. I believe him 100 per cent.. maybe we should change threshold cater for contamination.”
“However, in line with the World Anti-Doping Code and Tennis Anti-Doping Programme, Sinner’s results, prize money (£249,480) and ranking points (400) from the ATP Masters 1000 event at Indian Wells, where the player tested positive in competition for clostebol, are disqualified.”
Sinner’s lawyers say the amount of clostebol found in his system was less than a billionth of a gram.
And the star said: “I will continue to do everything I can to ensure I comply with the ITIA’s anti-doping programme.”
The ATP added: “This underscores the need for players and their entourages to take utmost care in the use of products or treatments. Integrity is paramount in our sport.”
Get updates delivered to you daily. Free and customizable.
It’s essential to note our commitment to transparency:
Our Terms of Use acknowledge that our services may not always be error-free, and our Community Standards emphasize our discretion in enforcing policies. As a platform hosting over 100,000 pieces of content published daily, we cannot pre-vet content, but we strive to foster a dynamic environment for free expression and robust discourse through safety guardrails of human and AI moderation.
Comments / 0