Get updates delivered to you daily. Free and customizable.
TheConversationAU
Digital health research can be positive for Indigenous people. But our study found it needs to follow these principles
By Andrew Goodman, Postdoctoral Fellow in Indigenous Health, CSIRORay Mahoney, Indigenous Science Research Director, Indigenous Science and Engagement, CSIROGeorgina Chelberg, Postdoctoral Fellow, Centre for Ageing and Translation, University of Canberra,
9 days ago
Digital technologies are transforming health care for all Australians, and this includes Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples. Electronic health interventions (eHealth) can involve features such as telehealth, instant messaging and mobile apps that support health care.
But testing what kinds of eHealth work for Indigenous people – and what don’t – relies on good quality research. And so far there hasn’t been strong, overarching guidance on what culturally safe eHealth looks like for Indigenous people.
We reviewed 39 studies about eHealth interventions for Indigenous people. We wanted to identify what made eHealth interventions effective, beneficial and culturally safe for the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander communities involved.
Here’s what we found.
Who does eHealth research benefit?
Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are the most researched human beings in the world, according to the National Health and Medical Research Council.
Researchers who want to explore the role of digital innovations in Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander health care need to consider whether it is beneficial for those Indigenous communities – not just the science community.
Studies have shown positive outcomes for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples using eHealth for a range of issues. They include mental health challenges, support for new fathers and upskilling health care staff.
We aimed to identify what characteristics underpin effective eHealth interventions. We also assessed the “cultural quality” of eHealth research involving Indigenous people. That means how well a study has integrated Indigenous ways of knowing, doing and being.
To do this we used an Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander framework, established in 2018. It asks 14 questions, including whether the research conducted was a priority of the community, and whether local community-controlled organisations or local Elders were consulted and engaged.
Here are the principles we found that underpin good digital health research for Indigenous people.
Building trust is crucial
Trust helps researchers establish credibility while allowing participants to have confidence in the research.
Trust may depend on a number of factors , including the community’s past experiences of research, whether researchers follow cultural protocols, and their institutions’ track record working with Indigenous people.
Aboriginal Community Controlled Health Organisations – or ACCHOs – play a crucial role creating strong and trust-based partnerships.
Building trust might look like:
using devices people are already familiar with
engaging people in eHealth services at an ACCHO or another culturally safe setting
using eHealth to complement existing health care and workers
respecting the diversity of individuals and their communities
acknowledging technology is not always relevant and has its limitations.
Relevance to people and place
What languages do participants speak? What are the local protocols?
We found eHealth research is successful when it responds to the specific needs, customs and cultures of the local community, rather than coming in with a cookie-cutter approach.
We also found interactive features like chat, messaging and game-like elements are more likely to engage First Nations people in a culturally safe way.
Authentic Indigenous leadership in research
Indigenous people should not only be involved in eHealth research, they should be leading it.
We found when studies had two or more Indigenous authors, they rated much more highly for cultural quality. This means they reflected Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander ways of knowing, doing and being.
Our study shows genuine co-design with Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander communities must be foundational in eHealth research, not an after-thought. Australia’s First Scientists must be engaged at the first hour, not the eleventh hour.
Georgina Chelberg received funding from CSIRO as a PhD Candidate and paid consultancy work in her current role.
Andrew Goodman and Ray Mahoney do not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and have disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.
Get updates delivered to you daily. Free and customizable.
It’s essential to note our commitment to transparency:
Our Terms of Use acknowledge that our services may not always be error-free, and our Community Standards emphasize our discretion in enforcing policies. As a platform hosting over 100,000 pieces of content published daily, we cannot pre-vet content, but we strive to foster a dynamic environment for free expression and robust discourse through safety guardrails of human and AI moderation.
Comments / 0