Get updates delivered to you daily. Free and customizable.
TheConversationCanada
Creating a gender-inclusive entrepreneurial landscape will help women fit in and thrive
By Alexandra Dawson, Professor of Entrepreneurship and Family Business, Concordia UniversityIngrid Chadwick, Associate Professor of Organizational Behaviour & Human Resource Management, Concordia University,
22 days ago
Women are increasingly becoming entrepreneurs worldwide, but the field remains male-dominated. (Shutterstock)
This gender bias means entrepreneurial programs, policies and funding have generally been designed to motivate and support men, leading women to feel like they do not “fit in.” Because of this, a critical barrier many women face is an identity conflict between what is expected of them as women and the traits expected of successful entrepreneurs.
Women entrepreneurs often face identity conflict, balancing societal expectations of warmth and consideration with entrepreneurial traits of competitiveness and assertiveness. (Shutterstock)
In our interviews, we asked 20 women to tell us why they became entrepreneurs, how they measured success and what they found most satisfying and challenging about their work as entrepreneurs.
We also organized three focus groups with 44 more women, including entrepreneurs and professionals working with or supporting entrepreneurs in government agencies, incubators or diversity units in global corporations.
We then coded the data to identify emerging concepts and themes. We shared our findings with a subset of our participants to confirm that these resonated with their experiences before coming to any conclusions.
Identity and mindset challenges
Based on participants’ stories, we classified them based on two dimensions: gender-entrepreneurial fit and mindset.
The first dimension — gender-entrepreneurial fit — indicates whether entrepreneurs see their gender and entrepreneurial identities as complementary or conflicting.
Some of the entrepreneurs we spoke to experienced a fit between their gender and entrepreneurial identity. They were able to balance their identities as women and as entrepreneurs and encouraged other women entrepreneurs to pursue entrepreneurship.
Others experienced a conflict between their gender and entrepreneurial identity. This was often because they faced gender stereotypes or worked in male-dominated environments.
The second dimension — entrepreneurs’ mindset — refers to whether entrepreneurs believe their abilities can be developed or not. This indicates a growth or fixed mindset , respectively.
Some respondents told us about their fear of failure or lack of confidence, indicating they had more of a fixed mindset. Others were able to learn from challenges and emotions, indicating a growth mindset.
A critical barrier many women face is an identity conflict between what is expected of them as women and the traits expected of successful entrepreneurs. (Shutterstock)
The power of mindset
Based on these two dimensions — gender-entrepreneurial fit and mindset (growth or fixed) — we then classified women entrepreneurs into three categories:
Imposter feelings: Entrepreneurs in this category experienced identity conflict combined with a fixed mindset leading to feelings of inadequacy.
Acceptance: These entrepreneurs also faced identity conflict but also had a growth mindset. They did not talk about fear or a sense of giving up; instead, they accepted their identity conflict without being passive, making sense of this conflict and pushing through it.
Authenticity: The largest group (about half of our study) displayed identity complementarity along with a growth mindset. Interestingly, apart from a few participants who reported never experiencing it at all, most entrepreneurs in this group told us they overcame identity conflict and imposter fears over time thanks to their growth mindset.
Our research found that women entrepreneurs often experience identity conflict and imposter feelings due to the male-dominated nature of entrepreneurship. However, with a growth mindset and identity complementarity, they were able to overcome imposter feelings and achieve acceptance and authenticity.
In particular, efforts need to be made to highlight the value of women entrepreneurs to disrupt the current masculine norms and biases around what is entrepreneurship. This includes promoting female role models and broadening the definition of entrepreneurial success to reduce identity conflict for women.
Additionally, entrepreneurial programs and policies should be designed to better address the unique challenges women face, including funding opportunities that are more accessible to women. By establishing grants, loans and investment funds, like the Women Entrepreneurship Loan Fund , for women entrepreneurs and women-owned businesses, we can encourage more of them to pursue their entrepreneurial ambitions.
We also encourage educators and policymakers to use more inclusive language in entrepreneurship, as masculine terminology can discourage women from becoming and succeeding as entrepreneurs.
While the focus of this study was on the identity conflict that women may face due to their gender in entrepreneurship as a masculine context, it is critical to recognize that some women face additional barriers as entrepreneurs due to other social categories such as race and disability . These categories need to also be considered in the promotion and support of women entrepreneurs.
By highlighting the value of all types of women entrepreneurs and addressing the barriers they face, we can pave the way for a more diverse and dynamic entrepreneurial ecosystem in Canada.
Ingrid Chadwick received funding from the Fonds Québécois de la Recherche sur la Société et la Culture (FRQ-SC) for this project.
Alexandra Dawson does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.
Get updates delivered to you daily. Free and customizable.
It’s essential to note our commitment to transparency:
Our Terms of Use acknowledge that our services may not always be error-free, and our Community Standards emphasize our discretion in enforcing policies. As a platform hosting over 100,000 pieces of content published daily, we cannot pre-vet content, but we strive to foster a dynamic environment for free expression and robust discourse through safety guardrails of human and AI moderation.
Comments / 0