That is not how that works. what gets me, is not only is that NOT how it works, but if you seriously thought that that was how it worked, that obviously doesn't make sense. So it seems like if it doesn't make sense the way that you believe, then you would investigate to make sure that what you're saying is truthful. Common use, such as music played at a party is okay. Music played on the jukebox, already has permissions, use limitations and is paid for. It is for use at specific arenas for specific thing. Artist have the right to not want their intellectual property to be associated with specific brands, products, and political affiliation. Usually when someone uses these entities for specifics like that, the artist is in agreement and paid for the intellectual property. How do you think they make money? There are so many examples of the Dunning-kruger, on this thread, this should parts of a psychology and sociology classes.