Governor Lombardo has been unapologetic about his stance, placing the blame squarely on the shoulders of those losing their homes. His decision to veto several Democrat-led housing bills, which aimed to ease the burden on Nevada’s most vulnerable residents, is seen by many as prioritizing the interests of wealthy campaign donors over ordinary citizens. "Joe Lombardo chose to veto numerous pieces of legislation that would have kept hardworking Nevadans in their homes, putting the interests of his campaign donors first," said Nevada State Democratic spokesperson Claudia Alvarado. One of the most controversial vetoes was of Assembly Bill 298, designed to prevent drastic rent hikes for seniors and Nevadans with disabilities—a bill that could have been a lifeline for those living on fixed incomes.
A Crisis Made in the Governor’s Office
The vetoes came amid growing criticism from social service groups who argue that Lombardo’s actions have directly contributed to the worsening eviction and homelessness crisis in Las Vegas. Lombardo’s refusal to support housing reforms is seen as aligning with the interests of Robert Bigelow, a billionaire landlord who supported Lombardo's campaign financially. This cozy relationship has led critics to question whether the governor is more concerned with the profits of slumlords than the welfare of his constituents.
“One Financial Crisis Away”
The fallout is being felt across communities in Las Vegas, Henderson, and Boulder City. Representative Dina Titus, D-Nev., who represents Nevada’s 1st District, has pointed out the dire consequences of these high eviction rates. “Lower income families living paycheck to paycheck and seniors on fixed incomes often are one financial crisis away from not being able to pay their rent and being evicted,” Titus stated. She has been vocal about the need for increased federal housing vouchers for Southern Nevada, noting that other cities of similar size receive significantly more support.
Lombardo’s veto of Senate Bill 335 is another flashpoint in this housing saga. The bill would have provided a 60-day reprieve for renters who had pending applications for rental assistance—a sensible protection that mirrored a 2021 law. Yet, Lombardo’s veto signaled a continuation of his hardline approach, leaving many renters without a crucial safety net.
No Safe Bet: Nevada’s Looming Eviction Tsunami
The consequences of Lombardo’s decisions are set to ripple across the state, exacerbating a housing crisis that shows no signs of abating. Social service groups and housing advocates warn that without intervention, Nevada could see even higher eviction rates and a surge in homelessness. The situation raises serious questions about the state’s commitment to protecting its most vulnerable residents in the face of economic instability and rising living costs.
Nevada’s housing crisis isn’t just a problem for those directly affected; it’s a growing issue that will impact the broader community, from increased demands on social services to a potential rise in crime and poverty levels. As the eviction rates climb, so does the frustration among Nevadans who feel abandoned by their leadership.
Your Turn - Like This, or Hate it?
Please offer an insightful and thoughtful comment. Idiotic, profane, or threatening comments are eliminated without remorse. Follow us to have other feature stories fill up your Newsbreak feed from Thumbwind Publications.
Get updates delivered to you daily. Free and customizable.
It’s essential to note our commitment to transparency:
Our Terms of Use acknowledge that our services may not always be error-free, and our Community Standards emphasize our discretion in enforcing policies. As a platform hosting over 100,000 pieces of content published daily, we cannot pre-vet content, but we strive to foster a dynamic environment for free expression and robust discourse through safety guardrails of human and AI moderation.
Local News
