Open in App
  • Local
  • U.S.
  • Election
  • Politics
  • Sports
  • Lifestyle
  • Education
  • Real Estate
  • Newsletter
  • Times of San Diego

    City Concludes Further Repairs to Damaged Ocean Beach Pier Not Feasible

    By Debbie L. Sklar,

    2024-08-23
    https://img.particlenews.com/image.php?url=0oVK1R_0v7wtTM200
    A lifeguard drives along Ocean Beach to check on beachgoers. Photo by Chris Stone

    The 58-year-old Ocean Beach Pier has been closed since it was damaged by high surf in October 2023. Further damage occurred last December when a support bracket broke off and fell into the ocean.

    “Engineering teams have determined that any work to rehabilitate the pier is not feasible, especially given the likelihood of additional damage occurring during future winter storms,” officials said in a statement released Friday.

    The safest and most cost-effective option for the Ocean Beach Pier is to keep the structure closed to public access while the city moves forward with a long-term solution to replace the pier, the statement said.

    “The Ocean Beach Pier is an iconic landmark of San Diego, but it was built nearly six decades ago and no longer can withstand the impacts of rising sea levels and storm surge along our coast,” said Assistant Director of the Engineering and Capital Projects Department Elif Cetin. “The decision on how to proceed factors in the likelihood that future storms will cause additional damage to the pier in coming years and whether it makes sense to pour resources into a structure that will continue to need extensive repairs or to instead invest in the long-term pier-replacement project.”

    A report released Friday outlined several immediate measures that could be taken to address the recent damage to the pier. However, due to the overall cost, timeline, feasibility and environmental permitting that would be required for those options, the city decided to leave the pier as is.

    Those immediate measures would not allow for the reopening of the pier. Additional repairs or rehabilitation would be required to reopen the it, which would include extensive construction, heavy machinery and the need to build a structure to support the equipment and construction personnel.

    While the pier does not pose an immediate threat to public safety, additional signs have been posted reminding visitors to be cautious when visiting the area, the city report said.

    The San Diego Municipal Code states it is against the law for anyone to swim, wade, surf or skin dive within 75 feet of any fishing pier owned or operated by the city.

    A 2018 study determined that the pier was beyond its useful life, recommending pursuing its replacement. At the time, minimal repairs would have cost about $8 million, and rehabilitation would have cost about $30 million to $50 million. Since that 2018 study was conducted, the pier damage and construction repair costs have significantly increased, further bolstering the case for replacement, according to the city.

    Repairing the damaged Ocean Beach Pier is no longer feasible, city officials said Friday.

    The 58-year-old Ocean Beach Pier has been closed since it was damaged by high surf in October 2023. Further damage occurred last December when a support bracket broke off and fell into the ocean.

    “Engineering teams have determined that any work to rehabilitate the pier is not feasible, especially given the likelihood of additional damage occurring during future winter storms,” officials said in a statement released Friday.

    The safest and most cost-effective option for the Ocean Beach Pier is to keep the structure closed to public access while the city moves forward with a long-term solution to replace the pier, the statement said.

    “The Ocean Beach Pier is an iconic landmark of San Diego, but it was built nearly six decades ago and no longer can withstand the impacts of rising sea levels and storm surge along our coast,” said Assistant Director of the Engineering and Capital Projects Department Elif Cetin. “The decision on how to proceed factors in the likelihood that future storms will cause additional damage to the pier in coming years and whether it makes sense to pour resources into a structure that will continue to need extensive repairs or to instead invest in the long-term pier-replacement project.”

    A report released Friday outlined several immediate measures that could be taken to address the recent damage to the pier. However, due to the overall cost, timeline, feasibility and environmental permitting that would be required for those options, the city decided to leave the pier as is.

    Those immediate measures would not allow for the reopening of the pier. Additional repairs or rehabilitation would be required to reopen the it, which would include extensive construction, heavy machinery and the need to build a structure to support the equipment and construction personnel.

    While the pier does not pose an immediate threat to public safety, additional signs have been posted reminding visitors to be cautious when visiting the area, the city report said.

    The San Diego Municipal Code states it is against the law for anyone to swim, wade, surf or skin dive within 75 feet of any fishing pier owned or operated by the city.

    A 2018 study determined that the pier was beyond its useful life, recommending pursuing its replacement. At the time, minimal repairs would have cost about $8 million, and rehabilitation would have cost about $30 million to $50 million. Since that 2018 study was conducted, the pier damage and construction repair costs have significantly increased, further bolstering the case for replacement, according to the city.

    — City News Service

    Expand All
    Comments / 5
    Add a Comment
    quo vadis
    08-24
    get fewsponsors build new one nicer longer charge little money
    JJ
    08-23
    Well, that won’t happen in my lifetime… Just like the imperial Beach sewage from Tijuana…
    View all comments
    YOU MAY ALSO LIKE
    Local News newsLocal News
    Robert Russell Shaneyfelt16 days ago
    Robert Russell Shaneyfelt13 hours ago

    Comments / 0