In a desperate ploy to remind people he’s still president (as all eyes have shifted to Vice President Kamala Harris), Biden penned an opinion column in The Washington Post this week, laying out several “reforms” for the U.S. Supreme Court.
The president's ideas should be shelved as quickly as his relevance.
This is a false narrative, and it’s a dangerous message to spread in an already polarized country. It probably wouldn’t surprise you that the only justices who have come under Democrats’ scrutiny are the ones appointed by Republican presidents.
Democrats are always smugly telling us how they are the only ones who can preserve democracy – while they back ideas that would undermine one of our nation’s most esteemed institutions.
Biden wrote: “What is happening now is not normal, and it undermines the public’s confidence in the court’s decisions, including those impacting personal freedoms.”
What isn’t normal is the level of orchestrated attacks on one branch of government by another one. The steady drumbeat of negative attention on the conservative majority of the nation's highest court is what has caused public confidence to drop – not its actions.
Democrats throw a tantrum because they don't like court's decisions
Demonstrators in front of the White House on July 29, 2024. Jemal Countess/Getty Images for Court Accountability
Let’s be real about what’s going on. Biden and Democrats are angry about decisions the court has made in recent years. First and foremost, they are aghast that the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade and returned limits on abortion to the states.
In other words, the Supreme Court did its job by serving as a check on another branch of government.
Biden’s proposed changes would blur the lines of the government’s separation of powers and the independence the court has enjoyed since its inception.
One upside: They are not likely to go anywhere soon. Republicans in Congress strongly oppose Biden’s blueprint, and any amendment to the Constitution would first need approval from two-thirds of the House and Senate , a high bar.
Yet, Harris – the likely Democratic presidential nominee – has embraced the reforms , meaning these are talking points that we will keep hearing about through the election.
While terms limits may sound nice – and offers Democrats a way to offload the sitting justices they despise – it goes against what our founders envisioned in the Constitution when they clearly wrote that justices and federal judges “ shall hold their Offices during good Behaviour .”
In other words, these are lifetime appointments, until death, retirement or impeachment intervene.
Opinion alerts: Get columns from your favorite columnists + expert analysis on top issues, delivered straight to your device through the USA TODAY app. Don't have the app? Download it for free from your app store .
Adam White, a senior fellow at the American Enterprise Institute who served in 2021 on Biden’s Presidential Commission on the Supreme Court of the United States , has closely studied policies such as term limits and court-packing. While he came into the assignment open to term limits via constitutional amendment, White told me he concluded that they'd be unwise in part because of fundamental shifts they'd spur in presidential power and the role of the Senate in confirming judicial nominations .
Get updates delivered to you daily. Free and customizable.
It’s essential to note our commitment to transparency:
Our Terms of Use acknowledge that our services may not always be error-free, and our Community Standards emphasize our discretion in enforcing policies. As a platform hosting over 100,000 pieces of content published daily, we cannot pre-vet content, but we strive to foster a dynamic environment for free expression and robust discourse through safety guardrails of human and AI moderation.
Comments / 0