Get updates delivered to you daily. Free and customizable.
USA TODAY
Student loan borrowers beware: Biden and Harris keep making promises they know are a scam
By Ingrid Jacques, USA TODAY,
6 hours ago
It’s the middle of August, which means back-to-school time for millions of Americans. It also may be a time of year that reminds people about the college loans they have to pay back.
President Joe Biden and Vice President Kamala Harris want you to know they’re on the case, even though they are well aware the ploys they’ve put in place to “cancel” or greatly reduce student debt are unconstitutional and unable to withstand judicial scrutiny.
In recent days, they’ve emailed 25 million borrowers to let them know about other avenues they may have for loan help. Trouble is, the rule that would allow the Biden administration to do this has yet to take effect, and it’s not clear when it will. More on that shortly.
In the meantime, Biden keeps running into legal roadblocks with the various plans he’s already tried to unilaterally put in place to wipe out student debt. He and Harris are doing a great disservice to these borrowers by continuing to offer hope for debt relief that they have no business – or authority – to offer.
On Friday, the 8th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals issued a preliminary injunction blocking Biden’s massively expanded income-driven repayment plan – the SAVE plan – while the lawsuit moves through the courts. This replaces an earlier, temporary stay the court had placed on the SAVE plan.
It’s likely that these latest cases will land before the high court again.
With this legal wrangling ongoing, Biden and Harris continue to march forward with even more debt forgiveness plans that they have no authority to implement yet, because the proposed rules that govern the debt relief remain just that – proposed.
They’ve sent out emails to millions of borrowers (who also happen to be voters) this month, to let them know about these costly plans they desperately want to put in place in the weeks ahead of the presidential election.
And Biden and Harris want us, American taxpayers, to cover the tab.
“It’s bad enough that the White House is pursuing costly new efforts to cancel student debt,” said Maya MacGuineas, president of the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget, in a statement. “They should not be actively evading potential legal challenges in an effort to circumvent the law.”
MacGuineas called the proposal “expensive, poorly targeted, bad for higher education cost and quality” and said it “may well be illegal.”
Any kind of broad – and expensive – debt forgiveness program should be created by Congress passing legislation, not the president simply issuing an order.
A group of GOP senators recently reintroduced legislation to halt the Biden-Harris administration's plans to cancel debt.
Opinion alerts: Get columns from your favorite columnists + expert analysis on top issues, delivered straight to your device through the USA TODAY app. Don't have the app? Download it for free from your app store .
“Not only are the Biden Administration’s student loan cancellation schemes morally questionable – forcing hardworking Americans who have already repaid their loans or decided to pursue alternative education paths to foot others’ bills – these policies are wildly inflationary, fiscally reckless, and do nothing to actually address the real problem of increasing higher education costs,” Sen. Mitt Romney, R-Utah, said in a statement .
If Harris, the newly chosen candidate to lead the Democratic presidential ticket, ever decides to do an interview or take questions , she should have to defend the administration’s illegal actions and answer for the damage they have caused.
Ingrid Jacques is a columnist at USA TODAY. Contact her at ijacques@usatoday.com or on X, formerly Twitter: @ Ingrid_Jacques .
Get updates delivered to you daily. Free and customizable.
It’s essential to note our commitment to transparency:
Our Terms of Use acknowledge that our services may not always be error-free, and our Community Standards emphasize our discretion in enforcing policies. As a platform hosting over 100,000 pieces of content published daily, we cannot pre-vet content, but we strive to foster a dynamic environment for free expression and robust discourse through safety guardrails of human and AI moderation.
Comments / 0