Get updates delivered to you daily. Free and customizable.
USA TODAY
Harris reveals good-vibes economic polices. Experts weigh in.
By Medora Lee, USA TODAY,
2 days ago
Democratic presidential nominee Kamala Harris revealed for the first time some big economic plans on Friday, but these experts had mixed reactions on how much some of them would help everyday Americans.
Many of these plans resonate with voters who have struggled in the past few years with soaring inflation, but some experts are wary of what they call “price controls” to fight high prices and how Harris intends to pay for some of her proposals. Any changes to the tax code also would require congressional approval and depend heavily on which party controls the House and Senate, tax experts say.
"It’s optimistic and targeted to improving the middle class; however, we have yet to see details, and it’s unclear how the congressional elections will impact the likelihood of passage," said Mark Baran, managing director at consulting firm CBIZ MHM's National Tax Office.
Former Republican New York congressman and senior vice president at business consultancy Alliantgroup Rick Lazio said in an email that the Harris campaign will need to consider "the societal costs of unsustainable higher public debt and its impact on inflation and the ability to respond to unplanned events, like recession, wars, pandemics, and natural disasters."
The nonpartisan Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget estimate her full plan would increase deficits by $1.7 trillion over a decade and grow to $2 trillion if temporary housing policies were made permanent. "The Harris campaign has said this would be paid for through taxes on corporations and high earners and that they support the revenue raisers in the President’s fiscal year 2025 budget but has not put forward specific offsets as part of their agenda to lower costs for American families," it said in a release.
To get a better view of what experts liked and questioned, USA TODAY has compiled a more detailed look of each proposal.
Child tax credit
A return to COVID-19-era child tax credit policies, which were $3,600 for qualifying children under age 6 and $3,000 for other qualifying children under age 18.
The credit is now $2,000 per qualifying child under age 17 and phases out for single filers earning over $200,000 and married couples with more than $400,000 in income. Republican vice presidential nominee JD Vance has floated a $5,000 credit and hinted at no income thresholds.
New, expanded tax relief of up to $6,000 for families with a newborn.
“We were super-excited to see her propose this big expansion,” said Mary Nugent, adviser of domestic policy at nonprofit Save the Children US. “To put it front and center and to be including this new kind of bonus for new parents with those youngest kids is really exciting in terms of the impact.”
Either Harris' or Vance's plan would reduce child poverty significantly , she said. The enhanced credit during the pandemic did so by half, she noted. “Most families would see an increased credit and, the top line there is that we would see massive cuts in child poverty.”
Health care and food prices
$35 price cap on insulin for Medicare recipients to cover insulin and annual out-of-pocket costs of $2,000 for all Americans, not just seniors.
Stiffer regulations and strict antitrust enforcement to prevent increased costs for consumers on drugs and food.
The Groundwork Collaborative, a nonprofit progressive advocacy group, praised Harris' push to hold companies accountable. “When just a handful of big companies control the majority of the market, or even control the market in a single region, they have the power to raise prices without worrying about a competitor nipping at their heels," Lindsay Owens, the group's executive director, said in a statement.
Economists were less enthusiastic, calling Harris' efforts "price controls."
“Harris is continuing with the Biden administration theme of blaming high inflation on corporate greed and price gouging – be it oil producers, pharmaceutical firms or, in this case, grocery retailers – rather than excessively loose pandemic-era fiscal and monetary policies,” wrote Paul Ashworth, chief North America economist for research firm Capital Economics, in a note. “She wants Congress to pass a federal ‘price gouging’ ban. It sounds uncomfortably like price controls , which could lead to product shortages.”
U.S. Vice President and Democratic presidential candidate Kamala Harris gives a speech, during an event at the Hendrick Center for Automotive Excellence in Raleigh, North Carolina, U.S., August 16, 2024. REUTERS/Kevin Lamarque Kevin Lamarque, REUTERS
New tax incentives for builders who construct “starter homes.”
Provide up to $25,000 in down-payment support for first-time homeowners.
“I’m encouraged by the recognition of by Vice President Harris of the affordable housing crisis in America,” Lazio said. “There is no congressional district in the nation that hasn’t seen a spike in the housing supply imbalance . Having said that, the devil is in the details, and some of the initiatives like the subsidy for first time homebuyers regardless of their wealth or income needs to be rethought.”
Ashworth also noted many developed countries around the world “have tried to boost homebuilding but have struggled to achieve their goals because of capacity constraints in the construction industry or other bottlenecks, like zoning regulations.”
Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, which expires at the end of 2025, is a massive tax package passed in 2017 that included provisions that touch almost every American. If it expires , tax rates for most Americans will rise, income brackets will narrow, and the standard deduction would get cut in half which could force many Americans to itemize again, among many other things.
It's the “big elephant in the room,” Baran said. “Letting it expire completely will hurt middle-class Americans because tax rates will go up.”
Ashworth also noticed the lack of discussion “of whether she would support the extension of the original Trump tax cuts, even for those making less than $400,000 a year. That potential fiscal cliff that would hit at the end of next year is the real policy battleground.”
This is “bad economic policy, but understandable from a political standpoint given that it could be enough to win the election race in Nevada,” Ashworth said. “Assuming there are limits on the amount of income that can be counted as tips and that only income taxes are eliminated rather than payroll taxes too, that tax cut might cost up to $150 billion over the next decade.”
Small and medium-sized businesses.
“I’m disappointed that there was nothing today that spoke to the need to protect and incentivize these businesses that employ half of all Americans, and up until recently have generated most of the industry innovation in America,” Lazio said. He said he’d like to see Harris endorse tax incentives for research and development to spur innovation and to keep tax rates for small businesses steady.
“Small-business people are middle-class people, too,” Baran said.
Medora Lee is a money, markets, and personal finance reporter at USA TODAY. You can reach her at mjlee@usatoday.com and subscribe to our free Daily Money newsletter for personal finance tips and business news every Monday through Friday morning.
Get updates delivered to you daily. Free and customizable.
It’s essential to note our commitment to transparency:
Our Terms of Use acknowledge that our services may not always be error-free, and our Community Standards emphasize our discretion in enforcing policies. As a platform hosting over 100,000 pieces of content published daily, we cannot pre-vet content, but we strive to foster a dynamic environment for free expression and robust discourse through safety guardrails of human and AI moderation.
Comments / 0