Get updates delivered to you daily. Free and customizable.
USA TODAY
Republicans for Kamala Harris? A true conservative couldn't vote for her.
By Ingrid Jacques, USA TODAY,
10 days ago
Let me tell you a story.
Eight years ago, in September 2016, I was on the editorial board of The Detroit News. During our endorsements that presidential election year, we made a decision that surprised a lot of our readers – and others around the country.
For the first time in the newspaper’s storied history, we chose not to endorse the Republican candidate.
As we wrote then : “The 2016 nominee offered by the Republican Party rubs hard against the editorial board’s values as conservatives and Americans. Donald Trump is unprincipled, unstable and quite possibly dangerous. He can not be president.”
So what did we do instead? As a conservative editorial board, we couldn’t bring ourselves to endorse the Democrat, Hillary Clinton, for her far-left stances and character challenges.
Rather than just write a non-endorsement, we wanted to be for somebody. We chose Libertarian Gary Johnson, the former two-term Republican governor of New Mexico. (Unluckily for us, the night before our endorsement ran, Johnson had a brain freeze on national TV when he couldn’t think of the name of a single foreign leader he admired – an “Aleppo moment,” as Johnson called it , referring to a former flub.) The next day, when local and national media outlets wanted to talk to us about our choice, was interesting to say the least.
What I will never understand, however, is how so-called never-Trump Republicans could bring themselves to enthusiastically support someone like Vice President Kamala Harris.
It’s an ever-growing list . And some recent prominent names include former Wyoming Rep. Liz Cheney and her dad, former Vice President Dick Cheney, who served with President George W. Bush.
“As a conservative, as someone who believes in and cares about the Constitution, I have thought deeply about this,” she said at an event last week . “And because of the danger that Donald Trump poses, not only am I not voting for Donald Trump, but I will be voting for Kamala Harris.”
Her distaste for Trump, after what happened with the Capitol riot on Jan. 6, 2021, is well-documented .
Since she’s gotten in the race, Harris has changed positions on pretty much everything she’s ever supported in the past, but that seems a change of heart based on political calculations rather than a shift in her “values.”
Yet, Trump is a better bet for conservatives to get some of what they may want, whether lower taxes, fewer regulations and strong judges, as we saw in Trump’s first term.
Opinion alerts: Get columns from your favorite columnists + expert analysis on top issues, delivered straight to your device through the USA TODAY app. Don't have the app? Download it for free from your app store .
“The idea that if we lose this election, we will lose everything is less true in the 21st century – not more – than it has been through most of American history. And so in a funny way, we’ve come to think of the stakes of our elections as impossibly high exactly in the moment when those stakes are lower than usual. I think the Constitution, if we become better acquainted with it, can remind us of that – that no election is about everything, and no election is ultimate and final.”
I don’t think our democracy is on the line this November.
I just love liberals theybare so entertaining I just think how can anyone be that stupid Helen Keller could see the last 3 years have been complete shit and she could also see that idiot VP has no plan except to turn our country in to a communist society our fore fathers would roll in their Graves to see what we've become they fought hard and write our constitution so our country and our people have a voice
Get updates delivered to you daily. Free and customizable.
It’s essential to note our commitment to transparency:
Our Terms of Use acknowledge that our services may not always be error-free, and our Community Standards emphasize our discretion in enforcing policies. As a platform hosting over 100,000 pieces of content published daily, we cannot pre-vet content, but we strive to foster a dynamic environment for free expression and robust discourse through safety guardrails of human and AI moderation.