'Shrinkflation' in Pepsi, Coke, General Mills products targeted by Democrats
By Mike Snider and Daniel de Visé,
3 days ago
Two members of Congress are calling out Coca-Cola , PepsiCo and General Mills over shrinkflation – reducing the size of their products, but not the prices – and price-gouging consumers while avoiding corporate taxes.
In letters dated Oct. 6 and sent to the CEOs of those three companies, Sen. Elizabeth Warren , D-Mass., and Rep. Madeleine Dean , D-Pa., wrote they were concerned about the "pattern of profiteering off consumers, both through 'shrinkflation,' and dodging taxes on those price-gouging profits."
The congresswomen cited several examples including PepsiCo's replacement of 32-ounce Gatorade bottles with 28-ounce bottles, but charging the same price, essentially "a 14% price increase," they wrote. General Mills reduced some Family Size cereals from 19.3 ounces to 18.1 ounces, while charging the same price, then raising prices five times from mid-2021-mid-2022, they charged. Coca-Cola, they said, used "package innovation" to sell "less soda for the same price."
As the companies used shrinkflation tactics from 2018 to 2022, each had billions in profits, Warren and Dean charged, but paid average effective tax rates of 15% or less – lower than the corporate tax rate of 21%, set by the 2017 tax cuts , passed during President Trump's term in office .
As each company "continues to profit off consumers," the congresswomen wrote, each "is also turning around and paying less of those profits in taxes than the families it price gouges."
The companies did not respond to request for comment from USA TODAY.
What is shrinkflation? Why is it on the rise?
Shrinkflation , reducing the size of a product's packaging but keeping the price the same, is not a new concept. Recent Labor Department data found shrinkflation is more common now than during the COVID-19 pandemic years. However, it was also common prior to the pandemic, the data shows.
But the issue has become a hot one as consumers have become highly price-sensitive over the past year. That's led companies to be more likely to reduce the size or volume of a product rather than hike the price.
The two congresswomen asked each company for pricing information of products (by ounces) over the past seven years, along with what the companies' federal tax would have been had the 2017 tax reform act not passed. They also asked whether executives got bonuses or other incentives during periods of high inflation.
Corporate practices – shrinkflation and low effective tax rates – can "have the effect of squeezing consumers two times over," they wrote.
Get updates delivered to you daily. Free and customizable.
It’s essential to note our commitment to transparency:
Our Terms of Use acknowledge that our services may not always be error-free, and our Community Standards emphasize our discretion in enforcing policies. As a platform hosting over 100,000 pieces of content published daily, we cannot pre-vet content, but we strive to foster a dynamic environment for free expression and robust discourse through safety guardrails of human and AI moderation.