Republicans appeal to Georgia Supreme Court to revive election ballot hand-count rule
By Aysha Bagchi, USA TODAY,
7 hours ago
The Republican National Committee and Georgia Republican Party appealed a Georgia judge's decision striking down seven new rules for the upcoming election, including one rule that would have required thousands of poll workers to hand-count ballots .
Judge Thomas A. Cox Jr. determined that the seven rules each contradicted Georgia's election laws and exceeded the authority of the Georgia State Election Board, which has passed a flurry of new requirements in the final weeks of the election.
The lawsuit was brought by a conservative advocacy group , Eternal Vigilance Action Inc., against the state board, and the state and national Republicans got court permission to join the case so they could also defend the rules. In a court filing ahead of Cox's decision, the Republican groups said the new rules fell within the board's duty to ensure local election officials engage in uniform practices.
The Thursday Republican notice of appeal didn't outline the arguments they plan to raise, but did say they are seeking to go straight to the Supreme Court of Georgia.
The state board's hand-count rule , which was passed Sept. 20 and slated to go into effect Oct. 22, had come under especially intense scrutiny. Georgia Republican Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger said the rule could lead to "error, lost or stolen ballots, and fraud."
Defenders of the rule said it would strengthen the vote-counting process and wouldn't change the Nov. 12 state deadline for counties to certify results.
A day before Cox's decision, another Georgia judge had already placed a temporary hold on the hand-count rule to stop it from going into effect for the upcoming election.
Get updates delivered to you daily. Free and customizable.
It’s essential to note our commitment to transparency:
Our Terms of Use acknowledge that our services may not always be error-free, and our Community Standards emphasize our discretion in enforcing policies. As a platform hosting over 100,000 pieces of content published daily, we cannot pre-vet content, but we strive to foster a dynamic environment for free expression and robust discourse through safety guardrails of human and AI moderation.