Get updates delivered to you daily. Free and customizable.
USA TODAY Sports Media Group
Olympic ranking: The National Teams with the best point differential in tournament history
By HoopsHype staff,
3 hours ago
With the 2024 Olympic Games from Paris officially wrapped up, we decided to review history and examine the National Teams with the highest point differentials in Olympic basketball history.
Somewhat noteworthy: The 2024 USA Basketball team – despite being as loaded as it was with LeBron James, Stephen Curry and Kevin Durant – had merely the 21st-best point differential in history, which speaks to how far the rest of the world has progressed in basketball. Meanwhile, the Dream Team led by Michael Jordan, Magic Johnson and Charles Barkley ranks second in differential… and No. 1 since NBA players compete in the Olympic tournament.
Below, check out the national basketball teams with the best average point differential in Olympic Games history.
1
1956 United States
Michael Ciaglo/Getty Images for USOPC
Average point differential: +53.50
Best game: Team USA 101 – Thailand 29 (72 points)
Worst game: Team USA 85 – Soviet Union 55 (30 points)
Final result: Gold medal
2
1992 United States
Getty Images
Average point differential: +43.75
Best game: Team USA 116 – Angola 48 (68 points)
Worst game: Team USA 117 – Croatia 85 (32 points)
Final result: Gold medal
3
1960 United States
Allsport Hulton/Archive
Average point differential: +42.38
Best game: Team USA 104 – Yugoslavia 42 (62 points)
Worst game: Team USA 81 – Soviet Union 57 (24 points)
Final result: Gold medal
4
1948 United States
AFP via Getty Images
Average point differential: +33.50
Best game: Team USA 86 – Switzerland 21 (65 points)
Worst game: Team USA 59 – Argentina 57 (two points)
Final result: Gold medal
5
2012 United States
Rob Schumacher-USA TODAY Sports
Average point differential: +32.13
Best game: Team USA 156 – Nigeria 73 (83 points)
Worst game: Team USA 99 – Lithuania 94 (five points)
Final result: Gold medal
6
1984 United States
AFP via Getty Images
Average point differential: +32.13
Best game: Team USA 120 – France 62 (58 points)
Worst game: Team USA 78 – Germany 67 (11 points)
Final result: Gold medal
7
1996 United States
Scott Cunningham/NBAE via Getty Images
Average point differential: +31.75
Best game: Team USA 133 – China 70 (63 points)
Worst game: Team USA 104 – Lithuania 82 (22 points)
Final result: Gold medal
8
1964 United States
Keystone/Hulton Archive/Getty Images
Average point differential: +30.00
Best game: Team USA 116 – South Korea 50 (66 points)
Worst game: Team USA 69 – Yugoslavia 61 (eight points)
Final result: Gold medal
9
1988 United States
USA TODAY NETWORK
Average point differential: +29.75
Best game: Team USA 102 – Egypt 35 (67 points)
Worst game: Team USA 76 – Soviet Union 82 (-6 points)
Final result: Bronze medal
10
1972 United States
EPU/AFP via Getty Images
Average point differential: +28.78
Best game: Team USA 99 – Japan 33 (66 points)
Worst game: Team USA 50 – Soviet Union 51 (-1 point)
Final result: Silver medal
11
1976 Soviet Union
Getty Images
Average point differential: +28.14
Best game: Soviet Union 129 – Japan 63 (66 points)
Worst game: Soviet Union 84 – Yugoslavia 89 (-5 points)
Final result: Bronze medal
12
2008 United States
Jerry Lai-USA TODAY Sports
Average point differential: +27.88
Best game: Team USA 106 – Germany 57 (49 points)
Worst game: Team USA 118 – Spain 107 (11 points)
Final result: Gold medal
13
1968 Soviet Union
Average point differential: +27.78
Best game: Soviet Union 123 – Morocco 51 (72 points)
Worst game: Soviet Union 62 – Yugoslavia 63 (-1 points)
Final result: Bronze medal
14
1968 United States
Average point differential: +26.00
Best game: Team USA 93 – Senegal 36 (57 points)
Worst game: Team USA 61 – Puerto Rico 56 (five points)
Final result: Gold medal
15
2016 United States
Elsa/Getty Images
Average point differential: +22.50
Best game: Team USA 119 – China 62 (57 points)
Worst game: Team USA 94 – Serbia 91 (three points)
Final result: Gold medal
16
2000 United States
Tim Sloan/AFP via Getty Images
Average point differential: +21.63
Best game: Team USA 119 – China 72 (47 points)
Worst game: Team USA 85 – Lithuania 83 (two points)
Final result: Gold medal
17
1936 United States
Average point differential: +20.75
Best game: Team USA 56 – Philippines 23 (33 points)
Worst game: Team USA 19 – Canada 8 (11 points)
Final result: Gold medal
18
1996 Yugoslavia
Smiley N. Pool/Houston Chronicle via Getty Images
Average point differential: +20.38
Best game: Yugoslavia 128 – China 61 (67 points)
Worst game: Yugoslavia 69 – Team USA 95 (-26 points)
Final result: Silver medal
19
2021 United States
Gregory Shamus/Getty Images
Average point differential: +20.00
Best game: Team USA 120 – Iran 66 (54 points)
Worst game: Team USA 76 – France 83 (-7 points)
Final result: Gold medal
20
1952 United States
Average point differential: +19.50
Best game: Team USA 103 – Chile 55 (48 points)
Worst game: Team USA 57 – Brazil 53 (four points)
Final result: Gold medal
21
2024 United States
DAMIEN MEYER/AFP via Getty Images
Average point differential: +19.00
Best game: Team USA 122 – Brazil 87 (35 points)
Worst game: Team USA 95 – Serbia 91 (four points)
Final result: Gold medal
22
1972 Soviet Union
STAFF/AFP via Getty Images
Average point differential: +18.56
Best game: Soviet Union 94 – Senegal 52 (42 points)
Worst game: Soviet Union 51 – Team USA 50 (one point)
Final result: Gold medal
23
1980 Yugoslavia
AFP via Getty Images
Average point differential: +18.50
Best game: Yugoslavia 129 – Poland 91 (38 points)
Worst game: Yugoslavia 96 – Brazil 95 (one point)
Final result: Gold medal
24
1960 France
Average point differential: +17.13
Best game: France 122 – Philippines 75 (47 points)
Worst game: France 70 – Hungary 74 (-4 points)
Final result: 10th place
25
1980 Soviet Union
Average point differential: +16.63
Best game: Soviet Union 121 – India 65 (56 points)
Worst game: Soviet Union 91 – Yugoslavia 101 (-10 points)
Get updates delivered to you daily. Free and customizable.
It’s essential to note our commitment to transparency:
Our Terms of Use acknowledge that our services may not always be error-free, and our Community Standards emphasize our discretion in enforcing policies. As a platform hosting over 100,000 pieces of content published daily, we cannot pre-vet content, but we strive to foster a dynamic environment for free expression and robust discourse through safety guardrails of human and AI moderation.
Comments / 0