Good morning, Winners! Hope you’re having a great week so far. You’ve made it to Wednesday. Congratulations.
The NFL’s trade deadline is still weeks away, yet the league was booming on Tuesday with a handful of trades that shook the league up.
The big one was Davante Adams going to the Jets. It was also probably the move everyone mostly saw coming — it was a matter of “when” and not “if,” considering how badly Aaron Rodgers was begging for it to happen.
This sort of trade explosion usually isn’t the status quo for the NFL. Normally, teams around the league are hesitant to make deals because of the financial implications from potential dead cap hits. Nobody wants to pay somebody who isn’t there anymore.
But the times are changing, it seems. And there’s a particular team in mind that needs to ride the wave: The Washington Commanders.
Washington is in the perfect position to make a splashy deal right now to improve its team.
At 4-2, the Commanders are atop the NFC East and one of the best teams in the conference. And, after a tough loss to the Ravens, it’s clear Washington isn’t too far away from competing in the upper echelon of the NFL. If there was ever a time to make a big move and go for it all, it’s now.
The argument against it is likely that it’s simply too soon. We’re only six weeks into the season and, despite Daniels’ production, it’s valid to ask how much you can trust a rookie quarterback to lead an offense into a deep playoff run. Practicing patience in a situation like this is always a smart thing to do.
But I’d also argue that making a trade here could be a boon for Daniels and an improving Commanders’ offense. Make a deal to improve the defense, and the margin for error will grow offensively. Make a trade to improve the offense and an already strong unit just gets even stronger.
Patience is great. But going all-in makes a lot of sense, too. Especially when you’re not really losing much of anything by doing it.
The Yankees have looked great this postseason, but the team’s best player has not.
For as good as New York has been in its trot through the American League so far, Aaron Judge’s presence in the run has felt remarkably absent. Heading into Game 2 of the ALCS Judge was batting .133 in 15 at-bats with an OPS of .564. That’s not very good.
The Yankees needed this to happen. They probably would’ve won without Judge’s homer but, if they’re going to win the World Series, New York is going to need Judge playing at his absolute best to do it.
Yankees fans have to be thrilled to see him finally breaking through here.
Tom Brady is officially a partial owner of the Las Vegas Raiders. With that said, it’s now incredibly hard for him to do his job in the broadcast booth for Fox.
As a partial owner, Brady is subject to NFL league rules, which restrict his ability to do certain essential things that make for a good broadcast.
“According to ESPN, Brady won’t be allowed in non-Raiders facilities (besides the stadiums he works to call games from). He can’t watch practices. He can’t attend broadcast production meetings in any capacity, which is a massive restriction on an announcer as those meetings are used to craft talking points and insight to carry a broadcast for three-plus hours.
He also can’t criticize game officials or other teams, which, again, is a wild limit to put on a broadcaster. He’d basically have to watch a potential game-changing missed call and either stay quiet or deflect blame away from the refs. That’s just a terrible disservice to viewers.
We’ll have to see how this all plays out on Sundays. But it can’t be good, particularly for a novice broadcaster like Brady. We may be at the point where we wonder if Brady is bad or just contractually limited to be bad at a job that is paying him $375 million over a decade.”
Either Tom Brady is about to face a lot of fines or our broadcasts are about to be as bland as unseasoned boiled eggs.
Quick hits: Shedeur Sanders to the Browns … RIP Johnny Gaudreau … and more
Get updates delivered to you daily. Free and customizable.
It’s essential to note our commitment to transparency:
Our Terms of Use acknowledge that our services may not always be error-free, and our Community Standards emphasize our discretion in enforcing policies. As a platform hosting over 100,000 pieces of content published daily, we cannot pre-vet content, but we strive to foster a dynamic environment for free expression and robust discourse through safety guardrails of human and AI moderation.