Virginians agree with Judge Jesse Furman that celebs involved with Diddy should be named

Will Judge Furman make sure all celebs are named?Photo byYouTube Screenshot Chronicles Speak

Should John and Jane Doe be named?

Some Virginians have been asking why the complicit celebrities are not being named with Diddy. Lisa P. and Bob J. from Southwest Virginia say they are tired of reading John Doe and Jane Doe. Chronicle Speaks says Judge Jesse Durman says the law demands that everyone be named.

One commenter on the video responded with the following. Every Celebrity , Enabler, and Participant should be exposed. They should not be allowed to buy there way out of it. They would continue to do these things if they are not exposed.

Anthony Buzbee says celebs are making dealsPhoto byChronicles Speaks YouTube

Why should Diddy go down alone?

Lawyer Tony Buzbee has said that some celebs are settling out of court so their careers will not be ruined, but Sherry E from Lynchburg, says Diddy's career is destroyed, and all guilty parties should be treated the same.

Dane A., who grew up in Roanoke, says everyone should stop judging Diddy and shake the dust from their feet. Elsbeth I., from Blue Ridge, argues that justice is demanded for all, and every name should be made public.

Angelo P from Franklin County said Diddy and everyone found guilty should be named because the public has the right to know which celebrities were involved, especially if children were assaulted. Buzbee has promised to "out" the celebs so stay tuned.