Now, after one lengthy search process for a developer ended with a scrapped development proposal , the city is paying a consultant to study the highest and best use of the mall site. However, top city officials have expressed interest in a development that centers on sports tourism.
The city has chosen Washington-based architecture consulting firm Gensler to conduct a market analysis and feasibility study for Military Circle, which will take up to 10-12 weeks, Mayor Kenny Alexander told attendees at a Downtown Norfolk Council event Wednesday.
“We envision Military Circle as a mixed-use hub that will integrate community sports, retail, residential options and modern, creative office space,” Alexander said.
The idea of a sports-and-wellness-focused development also works for stakeholder Sentara Healthcare, which owns several acres of the Military Circle property and whose insurance arm has offices in the former JCPenney location, said Norfolk Director of Economic Development Sean Washington.
“We want to make sure that we continue to do that work with them together as we go into this next phase,” Washington said.
As anchor stores such as Macy’s, Sears and JCPenney exited the mall, Norfolk commissioned a 2017 study funded by the state that said the property could accommodate 6,000 housing units and 16 million square feet of non-residential development.
Norfolk’s City Council then began negotiations with Williams’ group in 2022, in a closed-door process that deviated from its own selection guidelines. After months of negotiations, the city announced that the proposal had been shelved during a November City Council retreat.
During a Norfolk Economic Development Authority meeting this month, board chair Jeffrey Brooke criticized how the approach took place in the past and hoped that his body is included in further discussions. He said he was concerned the process might commit past sins and come out looking silly.
Asked to explain those remarks, Brooke said in a later interview that the previous process created the feeling that City Council would make the final decision on the development, and he hoped for more collaboration going forward. He noted that the EDA held the title to the mall property, while City Council possessed the taxing authority and potential public funding.
“I just want to make sure that we are fully involved, and I think we have no reason to believe that we will not be included in those discussions,” Brooke said.
Gensler is the same firm the city commissioned to conduct a similar market analysis for MacArthur Center redevelopment. While Gensler has submitted a report and analysis on that project, the city declined to make those documents public, citing business-related exemptions in Virginia public records law.
Nah. Family Entertainment, because Norfolk apparently is building all these places to live but no Entertainment for the families, which will leave these young children and teens bored. Why do we have to go to another city for that. Make it home and a community for everyone to get out, not for just people to get rich.
Mas
05-18
Should have gone with an arena with the people that already put in an RFP. Sports and music
Get updates delivered to you daily. Free and customizable.
It’s essential to note our commitment to transparency:
Our Terms of Use acknowledge that our services may not always be error-free, and our Community Standards emphasize our discretion in enforcing policies. As a platform hosting over 100,000 pieces of content published daily, we cannot pre-vet content, but we strive to foster a dynamic environment for free expression and robust discourse through safety guardrails of human and AI moderation.