Did Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson become a biologist?
She was on The View last week to discuss her memoir, Lovely One. The conversation between Jackson and the show’s left-wing panel featured many of the same liberal platitudes the show has become known for over the years. However, one comment by the Supreme Court justice went relatively unnoticed but should have been eye-opening: Jackson’s admitted realization of what a woman is.
It happened as the television hosts were fawning over the judge, lavishing her with teen-idol-type praise for being the first black woman Supreme Court justice — a feat that Jackson acknowledged herself.
“I know a little bit about being a first, you know. I think a lot of people were very happy about my appointment in part because they saw it as progress for the country. There was a time in which black women wouldn’t have had this opportunity,” Jackson said .
Keeping with the theme of womanhood, Jackson repeated her acknowledgment of her biological femininity during an earlier interview in September with PBS. During this conversation, Jackson again emphasized being a female and its importance in our history.
“I’m the first Black woman, as you say, but not the first Black woman who could have done this job,” Jackson said . “I think about Constance Baker Motley, who I talk about in the book and who was a role model for me.”
“But she grew up and came up in a time in which it wouldn’t have been possible for her to be appointed to the court,” the Supreme Court justice said. “And so I feel so fortunate to be in this position. And it shows the progress that we have made as a country.
Judging by her comments, one can assume that Jackson is quite proud of her accomplishments as a woman — and of other women such as Motley. Unlike her Supreme Court confirmation hearing, Jackson had no problem defining a woman, differentiating between males and females, and acknowledging the importance of gender when it came to her own place in American history.
Yet, it raises the question, when did Jackson become a biologist? This question must be asked because it is the only way in which someone could define what a woman is — at least, according to Ketanji Brown Jackson.
In March 2022, during the second day of Ketanji Brown Jackson’s confirmation hearing, Sen. Marsha Blackburn (R-TN), while referencing the landmark case United States v. Virginia, asked Jackson if she could define “woman.”
“Can you provide a definition for the word ‘woman’?” Blackburn asked.
“Can I provide a definition?” Jackson replied.
“Mhmm, yeah,” Blackburn said.
“No, I can’t,” Jackson said.
“You can’t,” Blackburn asked.
“Not in this context — I’m not a biologist,” Jackson said.
However, 2 1/2 years later, Jackson had no problem defining a woman. Furthermore, she seemed to celebrate what a woman was during her self-adoration sessions, lavishing praise upon herself for her historical accomplishment of being the first black woman in Supreme Court history.
CLICK HERE TO READ MORE FROM THE WASHINGTON EXAMINER
On March 21, 2022, Jackson swore, under oath , to tell “the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth.” But apparently, that oath meant nothing when it came to her political posturing to the LGBT community and her bogus claim of not being able to define what a woman was. It was all nonsense, it was all for show, it was all performative, and it was all to pander to what could only be described as left-wing cultural fanatics.
Recently, there's been conversations about ethics among the justices on the Supreme Court. If that is the case, then Ketanji Brown Jackson should be one of the first to be scrutinized for her inability to tell the truth. She always knew how to define a woman. Instead, she opted to be disingenuous out of a misguided allegiance to her political beliefs.
Local News
