Open in App
  • Local
  • U.S.
  • Election
  • Politics
  • Sports
  • Lifestyle
  • Education
  • Real Estate
  • Newsletter
  • WashingtonExaminer

    Taylor Swift wasted her presidential endorsement

    By Alex Rosado,

    8 hours ago

    https://img.particlenews.com/image.php?url=2vU7mM_0vU2v4YZ00

    Taylor Swift’s endorsement of Vice President Kamala Harris may fizzle out quickly, and that’s great news for Republicans .

    Immediately after the first presidential debate between former President Donald Trump and Harris, Swift posted on Instagram that she would vote for the Democratic ticket, signing off as a “Childless Cat Lady,” a not-so-subtle jab at Trump’s running mate, Sen. J.D. Vance (R-OH). Both Vance and Trump have since shrugged off the endorsement, and conservatives should follow suit.

    A Taylor Swift endorsement should be monumental because of her popularity and influence. In 2018, she endorsed Senate candidate Phil Bredesen, former governor of Tennessee, against now-Sen. Marsha Blackburn (R-TN), bringing attention to a widely undiscussed contest. Swift also endorsed Joe Biden for president in 2020, boosting youth political engagement nationwide. Biden’s camp had been courting her endorsement again this cycle until he was forced out of the race .

    Both endorsements came in October, a month historically known in politics for surprises that can upend a race’s dynamics. We know Swift’s endorsement has weight, as one report claimed it increased Tennessee youth’s early voting turnout by 664% in 2018. This was due to the proximity of her announcement to Election Day, getting voters excited right before casting their ballots.

    She may have jumped the gun this time by announcing her preference in early September.

    Especially in a presidential season this volatile, where Trump was almost assassinated and Harris’s running mate, Gov. Tim Walz of Minnesota, faces allegations of stolen valor, the media cycle is rapidly reacting to new developments. Thus, not every story gets the attention it deserves or reaches its widest audience.

    Despite the magnitude of Swift’s profile, the premature endorsement may lose its potency before Election Day. While it may provide a short-term boost for fundraising toward Democrats and general voter registration, the momentum will fade, as with any other celebrity’s support. Remember when singer-songwriter Charli XCX endorsed Harris, claiming July and August as “brat summer” ? Trends don’t last forever , and neither does political momentum, no matter the size of the wave.

    The announcement’s proximity to the Trump-Harris debate also seems a blunder. We are already seeing commentary on Swift’s endorsement being swept up in the debate buzz, sharing space with headlines on subjects such as Trump’s Springfield, Ohio, comments . By piggybacking off debate performance, Swift’s “big” endorsement loses some of the power it may have carried had it come closer to November.

    It doesn’t help the Democratic ticket that Swift’s endorsement comes as no surprise.

    Back in January, conservatives speculated that the Kansas City Chiefs would win the Super Bowl, giving tight end Travis Kelce’s girlfriend a stage to endorse Biden. That never materialized, but the expectations had been set. For months, the media fawned over the possibility of her support for Biden and Harris, reinforcing that notion when Trump reposted an AI photo of her in August.

    Whereas Swift’s prior endorsements sent shockwaves because she was mostly apolitical, this year her Democratic loyalty has been all but assumed. Since 2020, she has supported abortion access, made political protest songs , and called for Juneteenth to be a national holiday. She has a track record of backing the Democrats and their agenda; rallying behind Harris isn’t anything new or revolutionary.

    Republicans have been granted a gift with Swift’s miscalculation. The GOP can make its situation even better by not overreacting to it.

    Conservatives must not legitimize celebrity’s role in politics by being hysterical over Swift’s endorsement. It is unsurprising, so we must respond accordingly. Republicans should argue that the endorsement won’t change the dynamics of the race. They can neutralize Swift’s swaying power and explain how her post was predictable.

    CLICK HERE TO READ MORE FROM THE WASHINGTON EXAMINER

    But conservatives must also refrain from attacking Taylor Swift. Negative comments or retaliation might generate sympathy for her and awaken the powerful Swiftie fan base against GOP candidates. Keep policy as the election’s main focus; it’s what matters most in politics.

    Don’t give credit to Swift’s endorsement. Shake it off.

    Alex Rosado is a research fellow for Horizon Info Consult and a contributor for Young Voices. Follow him on X @Alexprosado .

    Expand All
    Comments / 1
    Add a Comment
    dennis b.
    22m ago
    the only policies that harris has been vocal on is the rights of abortion, trans, gay rights, open borders, the lies and women with power..she has no concept of the everyday life that effects each one of us with the cost of inflation, the threat of war, our 🇺🇲 homeless, our veterans, the violence in our streets, the illegals taking our jobs from the hard working people thats made our country who we are, young swities that follow swift that are encouaged to vote democratic have no idea what life truly is about, most will vote with the idea that abortion is more important than life and a family, ot they become trans, gay, to follow just because thats what shes speaking all about. just because you dont like PRES TRUMP doesnt mean he doesn,t know what he,s talking about, he is a business man, he can fix our economy and problems facing us, our life was better under TRUMP not the chaos thats happening now.. 🇺🇲🇺🇲🇺🇲TRUMP2024🇺🇲🇺🇲🇺🇲
    View all comments
    YOU MAY ALSO LIKE
    Local News newsLocal News
    WashingtonExaminer20 days ago
    WashingtonExaminer1 day ago

    Comments / 0