Open in App
  • Local
  • U.S.
  • Election
  • Politics
  • Sports
  • Lifestyle
  • Education
  • Real Estate
  • Newsletter
  • WausauPilot

    Your letters: Electoral College still viable, writer says

    By Shereen Siewert,

    7 days ago
    https://img.particlenews.com/image.php?url=2vjXTS_0vci59Kk00

    Respectfully, having spent the past 15 years lobbying within a growing network of Electoral College supporters, permit me to offer responses to the following three comments from Mr. (Barry) Burden’s Sept. 18 opinion:

    “Nowadays nearly every state has chosen to award all of its electoral votes to whichever ticket wins more votes in the state … .” The resolution to this challenge has little to do with the Electoral College. The states of Maine and Nebraska independently chose to award electors by congressional district. This maintains essential Electoral College safeguards while elevating the popular vote within the state. The correction resides in the other 48 state legislatures. While challenging, it’s no less so than amending the Constitution, as outlined in Article V. Remember, the Electoral College is embedded in Article 2 Section 1, and Amendment 12.

    “The handful of battleground states are efficient targets for harmful efforts that would otherwise not have much success meddling in elections.” The flip side of the argument is that while legislative watchdogs make corrections within individual states, removing the Electoral College’s legal walls around each state is a recipe for chaos. To further complicate matters, states/localities that adopt the Ranked Choice Voting model, also, face colliding cutoff dates for reporting.

    “Someone who wants to infiltrate the election system would have difficulty causing problems in a national popular vote because it is decided by thousands of disconnected local jurisdictions.” I submit the opposite would occur. If every vote were thrown into the national soup, it would all become invisible until it’s too late. In contrast, recall the 2020 election controversies in a handful of states: Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, Nevada, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin. Thanks to Electoral College legal walls around the states, the 20 states that border the ones in question were unaffected by the disagreements.

    Roberta Schlechter, NW regional volunteer for Michigan-based Keep Our 50 States

    Editor’s note: Wausau Pilot & Review gladly publishes commentary from readers, residents and candidates for local offices. The views of readers and columnists are independent of this newspaper and do not necessarily reflect the views of Wausau Pilot & Review. To submit, email [email protected] or mail to 500 N. Third St., Suite 208-8, Wausau, Wis. 54403.

    Expand All
    Comments / 1
    Add a Comment
    Guest
    6d ago
    So why is there an electoral college?The North with manufacturing had cities with large populations. The south had an agrarian society, few citizens. The south refused to agree with the passage of the Constitution as written because they felt they were not given the same number of votes for the president as the North. So they compromised, the South did have a lot of non-citizens, non-voters ( known as slaves ) Section 2 of article 1 of the Constitution of the United States which states the count for representation equals numbers of free persons including those bound to service for a term of years and excluding Indians not text, 3/5 of all other persons( slaves ) No it was not made to give small states more power The thing is states do not vote,cities do not vote, villages do not vote, townships do not vote, people vote. And to keep the south ratifying the Constitution this 3/5's bs was invented. Time for the person with the most votes to be declared the winner.
    View all comments
    YOU MAY ALSO LIKE
    Local News newsLocal News
    Robert Russell Shaneyfelt6 days ago

    Comments / 0