Get updates delivered to you daily. Free and customizable.
Windows Central
Gmail creator says Google missed its opportunity with AI to maintain search dominance — which is barely clinging on after the antitrust monopolist ruling
By Kevin Okemwa,
1 day ago
What you need to know
Google's cofounders envisioned it as an AI company at launch, and at some point even developed a DALL-E 3 iteration and AI-powered chatbot dubbed Lambda.
The company veered off the mission after Alphabet's reorg in 2015, placing Sundar Pichai at the helm as the cofounders took a backseat.
Google's recent attempts to venture into the AI space (Google AI Overviews) have received backlash from users for generating erroneous responses and recommendations.
Apple and Google are often considered late bloomers in the AI landscape compared to Microsoft which hopped onto the bandwagon and adopted the tech across its products and services. In the just-concluded antitrust case, Judge Amit Mehta ruled that Google is a monopolist in the search landscape due to its dominance in the category.
The company will likely appeal the antitrust ruling, pushing regulation measures beyond the horizon. Experts, including a former Google engineer, say the company has bigger fish to fry with OpenAI's SearchGPT tool than the antitrust monopolist ruling and regulation.
Interestingly, when Google co-founders Larry Page and Sergey Brin launched the company in 1998, they envisioned it as an AI company. Gmail Creator Paul Buchheit recently touched base with the Y Combinator Startup podcast crew to shed more light on the company's founding mission and missed opportunities in the AI landscape, despite its vast resources (via Business Insider ).
How Google missed opportunities in the AI landscape
Admittedly, Google's efforts in the AI landscape can't go unnoticed. Like its competitors, the company has an AI-powered chatbot dubbed Google Gemini (formerly Google Bard). It can generate content and works seamlessly with Google services like Gmail, Docs, and more to enhance productivity.
As you may know, AI heavily relies on tools like Google for training. Based on this premise, Google should be at the forefront of this technology since it's well-positioned to leverage these resources. However, the company is unable to tap into these opportunities.
According to Buchheit, Google seemingly lost its AI vision when its parent company, Alphabet, reshuffled it and made Sundar Pichai the CEO in 2015. Google's founders seemingly took a backseat, leaving little drive toward the company's AI visions as more effort was placed on maintaining its dominance in search.
Google leverages its dominance in search to sell ads to users, but cutting-edge and emerging tools like ChatGPT and Copilot are increasingly becoming a threat to this business model. These AI-powered tools can generate simple, bite-size answers to queries, completely redefining how users interact with the internet.
It's worth noting that these tools are occasionally riddled with challenges such as misinformation, downtimes, and more. As these issues become more prevalent, users are inclined to use the conventional way of searching for things on the internet — Google .
According to Buchheit:
"A search company has an inherent tension between profitability and giving the right answers because there's always a temptation that if you make your results worse, people will actually click on more ads."
In the early days, before the Alphabet reorg, Google was already ahead of its time. Buchheit says Google had developed a DALL-E 3 iteration and AI-powered chatbot dubbed Lambda (originally called Human because it was "conscious"). The image generational tool Image gen was prohibited from generating images in human form.
"A lot of Google's business is just to deal with regulators," added Buchheit. "AI is an inherently disruptive technology." The company's AI mission and vision took a backseat as a bold attempt to be risk-averse to avoid the challenges that come with the tech.
Get updates delivered to you daily. Free and customizable.
It’s essential to note our commitment to transparency:
Our Terms of Use acknowledge that our services may not always be error-free, and our Community Standards emphasize our discretion in enforcing policies. As a platform hosting over 100,000 pieces of content published daily, we cannot pre-vet content, but we strive to foster a dynamic environment for free expression and robust discourse through safety guardrails of human and AI moderation.
Comments / 0