Get updates delivered to you daily. Free and customizable.
WyoFile
Rancher compensation bill for hungry elk rises from ashes as proposed rule change
By Mike Koshmrl,
30 days ago
User-posted content
When grass on private land intended for livestock gets munched first by elk — and other big game — wildlife managers are taking steps to better compensate ranchers left with hungry animals.
A proposed Wyoming Game and Fish Department regulation change came about because of elk populations that have exceeded state goals and caused landowners problems, said Craig Smith, the agency’s deputy chief of wildlife.
“It’s reached a point where we do feel like we need to do something a little bit extra in order to … address the issue,” Smith told WyoFile. “We need to try to do what we can to alleviate that hit to those folks.”
Although the draft regulation isn’t specific to elk, that’s the species most likely to bring it into play, especially in the near term. Mule deer and pronghorn populations have consistently struggled in recent years from a variety of causes: drought , disease and habitat loss , among others.
Largely, the planned update to Game and Fish policies mirrors language from an especially controversial bill that was making its way through the Legislature before the Wyoming Senate Majority Floor Leader Sen. Larry Hicks (R-Baggs) stepped in and killed it .
“The language in the draft regulation is fairly similar to what was in House Bill 60,” Smith said. “It was fairly clear what the intent of that legislation was, and so we did use that as a basis on how to develop the draft [regulation].”
The legislation was set in motion by livestock lobbyists and upset ranchers who caught the ears of lawmakers between legislative sessions in 2023.
Specifically, the updated regulations would make ranchers eligible for “extraordinary damage to grass” payments if their land is located in an area where big game herds exceed Game and Fish goals by 20% for three or more consecutive years. Overpopulated herds would have to consume more than 15% of the estimated grass that grows on a property — and only private land is eligible.
Additionally, landowners who lose 30% of their lands’ forage to big game would be eligible regardless of whether the herd eating the grass is considered overpopulated.
“Assuming it’s adopted generally as it’s written, I wouldn’t foresee us coming back with any legislation,” he said. “That door is always open, but I think that we would want to give this the opportunity to function appropriately.”
The bill that Game and Fish’s proposed regulation change was based on proved exceptionally controversial during the Legislature’s 2024 budget session. Partly, that was because the bill’s first iteration would have compensated ranchers for more than the grass was worth: 150% of the market value . Hook-and-bullet advocacy groups that lobby on behalf of Game and Fish also took issue with the projected cost of the legislation: $1.68 million, an amount Game and Fish would have to pay with hunter and angler dollars — and that was the low end of the estimate.
Chief Warden Rick King told WyoFile that it’s tough to predict what the Game and Fish regulation change would cost the agency. It’s dependent on how many landowners make claims and the investigations into those claims, he said.
“Just like with House Bill 60, there’s still a concern about workloads and additional workloads,” King said, “so we’ve taken some measures to address and prepare for that.”
A large elk herd kicks up a cloud of dust as it evacuates a hillside on Little Mountain. (Steven Brutger)
Game and Fish, which has faced warden shortages , added four new positions — one each in Sheridan, Casper, Laramie and Green River — to mitigate and prevent damage and investigate claims.
Claimants who’ve been found credible would be paid the “going market rate” for their lost grass, Smith said.
There are several administrative steps remaining before Game and Fish’s draft regulation change would take effect. The Wyoming Game and Fish Commission is expected to consider the change at its Sept. 10-11 meeting in Douglas. Gov. Mark Gordon would also need to sign the revised regulation.
Get updates delivered to you daily. Free and customizable.
It’s essential to note our commitment to transparency:
Our Terms of Use acknowledge that our services may not always be error-free, and our Community Standards emphasize our discretion in enforcing policies. As a platform hosting over 100,000 pieces of content published daily, we cannot pre-vet content, but we strive to foster a dynamic environment for free expression and robust discourse through safety guardrails of human and AI moderation.
Comments / 0