The taxpayers association argued that the Prop. 5 label should say that it would lower the majority required to approve local borrowing measures from two-thirds to 55%. The original label — a condensed version of the title and summary — only included the 55% figure, so voters might believe that the threshold is being raised from a simple majority, the taxpayer group says.
The ruling last week, which the attorney general’s office appealed, found that the label “fails to inform” voters the main purpose of Prop. 5, and that without “additional clarifying language,” the label could mislead voters. (Labels are allowed to run 75 words long and Prop. 5’s label is 65 words.)
Laura Dougherty, the association’s director of legal affairs, said in an email to CalMatters that the attorney general “has a duty to inform the public of the chief points and purposes of every measure” and that “there are plenty of words left for the printer to add the information.”
In his ultimately successful appeal, Attorney General Rob Bonta said the office is afforded “substantial deference” in determining ballot labels. Not only is Prop. 5’s label accurate, Bonta argued, but also that the court “seemingly invented a new” standard of review that granted his ballot materials less consideration “if he does not use all available words.”
Rent control: It’s not just the title and summary: Supporters and opponents can also go to court about the official ballot arguments. The same judge on Monday found that four of the six statements made by the California Apartment Association about Prop. 33 , a rent-control measure that the association opposes, must be deleted or amended. The court order called for language that hedges the association’s claims: For example, its argument must say Prop. 33 would “weaken,” not “repeal” renter protections, and “undermines,” not “eliminates” a statewide rent control law.
School bond: There’s another battle brewing, this one on Prop. 2 , which would let the state borrow $10 billion to fix and build schools and community colleges. The state Republican Party is weighing whether to endorse it, and a recommendation for “yes” from the party’s 14-member Initiatives Committee is drawing fire from California College Republicans and some Republican legislators .
The college group says Prop. 2 violates the party platform and also points out that the state party had a neutral position on Prop. 1 , Gov. Gavin Newsom’s mental health measure on the March ballot that included $6.4 billion in bonds — and that barely passed. (The state Democratic Party is supporting Prop. 2.)
GOP delegates can reject the committee’s recommendation with a two-thirds majority and have until Aug. 28 to vote.
Ellie Hockenbury , California GOP spokesperson: “The CAGOP’s ballot initiative endorsement process is still underway, and we have not yet taken a position on Proposition 2. The party greatly respects our delegates and values their opinion as part of that process.”
More honors: Sisi Wei, now chief impact officer at CalMatters, won the leadership in diversity and solidarity award from the Asian American Journalists Association for her work as editor in chief of The Markup, which joined CalMatters earlier this year. Speaking of the AAJA, it partnered with CalMatters for the second year of JCal, a summer training program for high school journalists. Read more on both from our engagement team.
State Insurance Commissioner Ricardo Lara speaks during a press conference with labor leaders and advocates in Commerce on Sept. 26, 2022. Photo by Alisha Jucevic for CalMatters
California Insurance Commissioner Ricardo Lara bypassed the Legislature and announced changes that could mean insurance companies’ requests to raise premiums would get approved more quickly.
As the state scrambles to deal with problems with property insurance availability and affordability, a planned trailer bill by Gov. Newsom proposed speeding up insurance rate reviews to get insurance companies to start or resume writing more policies here. (Trailer bills are attached to the state budget, and sometimes change policy with minimal public discussion .)
But apparently even this shortcut was not fast enough: On Friday, the Insurance Department and the governor’s office said they needed to act immediately, so Lara issued a bulletin that does the same thing as the trailer bill. “We do not have the luxury of time,” Lara said in a press release.
The Legislature actually took no action on the trailer bill, according to two sources familiar with the matter. They said the proposal was more about policy and not about the budget, so lawmakers — who are having to make difficult choices as they deal with a multibillion-dollar deficit — didn’t even consider it.
Democratic Senate Pro Tem Mike McGuire of Santa Rosa did not seem to mind that Lara issued a bulletin instead. “The importance is intensifying as wildfires continue to take lives, destroy homes, and level communities,” he said in a statement.
The changes Lara announced in the bulletin establishes a tighter timeline for rate reviews and are one part of his broader plan to try to fix the state’s insurance woes . The Insurance Department must respond within 60 days of a rate review, with room for two 30-day extensions, once its new rate-reconciliation tool that will help with the process is up and running. This is expected to be in January, according to department spokesperson Michael Soller. Insurance companies have complained about rate reviews taking too long, so some representatives of the insurance industry have said the changes are necessary.
But Consumer Watchdog, an advocacy group that often challenges rate reviews, is looking into the commissioner’s authority to make such changes. Carmen Balber, the group’s executive director, told CalMatters the stricter timelines for rate reviews might “limit consumers’ voice in oversight.”
Speaking of insurance: Rising insurance costs don’t just impact single-family homeowners. Levi dives into how insurance companies have nearly stopped writing policies for apartment and commercial properties, too . And landlords could pass higher insurance premiums onto tenants, further worsening the state’s housing crunch.
Carolina Sanchez Garcia cooks with her daughter, Berthalinda Hernandez, 6, at their home in San Diego on Aug. 7, 2024. Photo by Zoë Meyers for CalMatters
To address the state’s high cost of living and looming teacher shortage, California’s schools chief Tony Thurmond laid out an ambitious plan in July to develop more housing for teachers using land owned by school districts.
Thurmond’s plan includes financial incentives for districts that pass bonds to build staff housing. But many districts can’t even pass bonds to repair existing school buildings. Some superintendents also say they’re already spread too thin — to expect them to undertake complex real estate projects is a tall ask.
Mendocino County Superintendent Nicole Glentzer: “When you’re the superintendent and the principal and head of maintenance and you’re teaching Spanish, how are you supposed to find the bandwidth for this? I have a degree in education. I never took a real estate course.”
But supporters of the plan point to teachers such as Carolina Sanchez Garcia, a San Diego preschool teacher. For more than a decade, she said she commuted from Tijuana, waking up at 2 a.m. to get to work on time. After landing a three-bedroom apartment through San Diego Unified, it now takes her 15 minutes to get to work. She pays $1,300 a month in a city where the median rent is $3,156 a month .
Garcia: “It’s changed my life. … It’s made me a better mother and a better teacher. Now, I start my day feeling positive and energized.”
CalMatters columnist Dan Walters: Gov. Newsom is quick to blame local governments for not doing enough to reduce homelessness, but experts and local officials say withholding state funds is the biggest impediment .
California Voices intern Kate McQuarrie: Seven years after the #MeToo movement galvanized women in the state Legislature, accusations of sexual assault within the San Francisco Democratic Party underscore how prevalent sexual misconduct remains in California politics .
Get updates delivered to you daily. Free and customizable.
It’s essential to note our commitment to transparency:
Our Terms of Use acknowledge that our services may not always be error-free, and our Community Standards emphasize our discretion in enforcing policies. As a platform hosting over 100,000 pieces of content published daily, we cannot pre-vet content, but we strive to foster a dynamic environment for free expression and robust discourse through safety guardrails of human and AI moderation.
Most Popular
Comments / 0