Trump lawyers argue Fani Willis hid Nathan Wade relationship in desperate bid to keep DA job: ‘Reaped the benefits’

Fani Willis was accused of hiding the truth and her relationship with Nathan Wade in a desperate attempt to keep her job as district attorney in court Friday.

The accusations were made at Fulton County Superior Court in Georgia by lawyers for Donald Trump and his co-defendants, who stand charged with interfering in the 2020 presidential election and have been battling to get Willis thrown off their case.

Willis was accused of employing her one-time boyfriend, Nathan Wade, as special prosecutor, which the defendants say presents a conflict of interest.

Attorney John Merchant claimed during the hearing: “She put her boyfriend in the spot, paid him and then reaped the benefits from him.”

Trump calls out DA Fani Willis for her ‘sexcapades’ with one-time beau Nathan Wade

Willis and Wade have said under oath their relationship began in 2022 and ended the next year, but the lawyers for Trump and his co-defendants argue it started in 2019.

Attorney Richard Rice said, “They want you to ignore all evidence the relationship started in 2019.”

He noted Wade’s phone records showed the two exchanged 2,000 calls and nearly 900 texts in the first 11 months of 2021.

Fani Willis misconduct hearing live updates: ‘Daddy didn’t even know they had a relationship!’ Trump attorney bellows; judge reveals when he’ll decide whether to kick her off the case

“I don’t think even lovestruck teenagers communicate that much,” Rice said.

The texts of Wade’s ex-law partner, Terrence Bradley, became key evidence after a message he sent seemingly confirmed the relationship started before Wade was appointed prosecutor in 2021.

But in closing arguments, Fulton County District Attorney’s Office prosecutor Adam Abbate said Bradley “could not pinpoint a time frame when the relationship occurred.”

CLICK HERE TO SIGN UP FOR OUR MORNING REPORT NEWSLETTER

He also said “Mr. Bradley had every motive to lie,” after he’d left Wade’s law practice under suspicion of sexual assault.

Abbate said Trump’s side hasn’t shown an “actual conflict” worthy of throwing Willis off the case.

One of the key points in the case is whether Trump and his co-defendants have to prove an actual conflict of interest, or simply the appearance of one.

While Wade attended the full hearing, Willis only appeared when Abbate was about to present his argument and left just as he finished.

Trump’s lawyer Steve Sadow insisted in his rebuttal, “Who’s motive in this case is the strongest? Fani Willis and Nathan Wade. Because . . . what happens if the relationship started before November 2021? They get disqualified . . . Who has the most at stake to lie? They do.”

Judge John McAfee said he hopes to rule in the next two weeks.

For top headlines, breaking news and more, visit nypost.com.