All of them appeared on the aftershow “Overtime” segment, during which things got heated when the subject of the Capitol riot came up:
JOHN AVLON: No, I. The larger issue obviously, is January 6th, right? And the problem is with the immunity decision.
History is really clear. If you don’t hold people accountable when they indulge in political violence, then you get more political violence.
And I’m really curious about the– do you think conservatives end up supporting the Constitutional amendment to overturn the immunity decision if a Democrat is president? I wonder if they will.
RICH LOWRY: I think the way these kind of decisions work. We saw it with the independent counsel statute decision that Supreme Court has. In Washington eventually, this stuff always comes around and bites the other side.
So right now Democrats are so upset the Supreme Court has done this. Then if Kamala Harris is elected and some Republican prosecutor somewhere in the middle of Red America wants to indict her and prosecute her for some official act, the Supreme Court will say no.
And Democrats are suddenly, what, a minute? Maybe that decision wasn’t so outrageous after all.
HR MCMASTER: What we’ve seen is this tendency on both ends of the political spectrum to, you know, to score partisan, points at the expense of confidence in our institutions.
BILL MAHER: But Trump really does commit crimes. Let’s not forget that little part of it.
JOHN AVLON: We’re 60 days out from an election, and I think we’ve normalized this a little bit, and it’s far too freaking dangerous.
BILL MAHER: He he really does commit crimes is one thing and two, if the positions were reversed and a Democrat did this. Not only would the Republicans go after them, but they would have done it instead of what the Democrats who talk about feckless. General, this is feckless. You had four years to bring four trials, and we get none of them?
JOHN AVLON: And it’s because they were afraid of politicizing. Look, that’s the thing, is that if if Democrats did what Donald Trump did, you would be opposing ’em totally. And by the way, so would I.
BILL MAHER: Okay. So–.
I think that’s the issue.
RICH LOWRY: I’m so extensively on the record about January6 . I’m completely appalled by it, but —
BILL MAHER: You’re not so appalled, you’re not going to vote for Trump!
RICH LOWRY: This is different Bill–.
BILL MAHER: You’re not appalled!
RICH LOWRY: No, I am appalled!
But you’re still going to vote for him!
RICH LOWRY: If January 6th didn’t happen. You would still oppose Trump. Because you don’t like him on policy, right? From. No no no no, from from where I sit in the first–.
BILL MAHER: I don’t, mostly, no. No. But–
RICH LOWRY: But you support Trump’s policies.
BILL MAHER: I said I said no, mostly I think.
RICH LOWRY: You would consider voting for him absent January 6th?
BILL MAHER: No.
RICH LOWRY: Right.
BILL MAHER: If he conceded elections. He would not be the boogie man he is. He would just not be the villain he is. That’s the main thing. He politicized the Justice Department and he does not concede elections. These are two very new things.
.
Comments / 0