Get updates delivered to you daily. Free and customizable.
New York Post
ESPN criticized for showing Iga Swiatek’s backstage crying reaction at US Open
By Jenna Lemoncelli,
7 hours ago
Some found it cruel that ESPN cameras focused on Iga Swiatek crying after her loss to Jessica Pegula in the quarterfinals at the US Open on Wednesday.
Swiatek, the world No. 1, was seen with tears in her eyes while lying down after Pegula, the home favorite, beat her in straight sets.
The camera stayed on the Polish pro, who wiped her eyes for nearly 20 seconds in the backstage area the players populate before and after matches at Arthur Ashe Stadium.
“That performance, tearful,” one of the broadcasters said. “Just couldn’t find her game. It was unsettled from the start. Just couldn’t deal with Pegula at all.”
Some found it to be of poor taste for ESPN to focus on Swiatek’s emotional reaction.
“Hi ESPN we do not need to see Iga crying in the back!!!!” Lindsay Gibbs, founder of the Power Plays newsletter, wrote on X.
Ben Rothenberg, who hosts the “No Challenges Remaining” podcast, took issue with ESPN having cameras set up in areas where players go to unwind after matches.
At one point, she smashed her racket on the net after getting her serve broken in the second set.
“It’s never easy to play against Jess,” Swiatek said, according to ESPN. “She has a tricky ball because it’s pretty low and pretty flat. I just made too many mistakes.”
Pegula — who’s billionaire father, Terry Pegula owns the Buffalo Bills and Sabres — has yet to drop a set at the tournament, and has won 14 of her last 15 matches.
She was 0-6 entering her Grand Slam quarterfinals match with Swiatek.
The sixth-seeded American will face unseeded Karolina Muchova of the Czech Republic on Thursday.
For the latest in sports, top headlines, breaking news and more, visit nypost.com/sports/
Get updates delivered to you daily. Free and customizable.
It’s essential to note our commitment to transparency:
Our Terms of Use acknowledge that our services may not always be error-free, and our Community Standards emphasize our discretion in enforcing policies. As a platform hosting over 100,000 pieces of content published daily, we cannot pre-vet content, but we strive to foster a dynamic environment for free expression and robust discourse through safety guardrails of human and AI moderation.
Comments / 0