Open in App
  • Local
  • U.S.
  • Election
  • Politics
  • Crime
  • Sports
  • Lifestyle
  • Education
  • Real Estate
  • Newsletter
  • WLNS

    Court of Appeals upholds Ingham Co. man’s meth convictions

    By Todd Heywood,

    2 days ago

    LANSING, Mich. (WLNS) — An Ingham County man will stay in prison after the Michigan Court of Appeals upheld his jury convictions for possessing with intent to deliver methamphetamine.

    Chad Allyn King, 50, was convicted in Ingham County Circuit Court for three counts of felon in possession of a firearm and two counts of delivery of methamphetamine, his Michigan Department of Corrections prisoner information reveals.

    Following the Court of Appeals decision, King will stay in the Central Michigan Correctional Facility in St. Louis, Gratiot County.

    King had appealed the conviction for delivery, arguing the Ingham County prosecutors who charged and prosecuted him failed to provide enough evidence to prove he possessed and delivered the drug.

    https://img.particlenews.com/image.php?url=0qF1Hj_0uWvpZkW00
    Chad Allyn King, 50, is not entitled to relief in claims related to methamphetamine delivery convictions by an Ingham County Circuit Court jury. He was sentenced to prison in 2023. (Courtesy Michigan Department of Corrections)

    The Michigan Court of Appeals ruling, issued July 18, reports a detective for a multiagency undercover narcotics investigation met with King, and his co-defendant Erica Miller in 2021. The detective testified he purchased what the Michigan State Police Crime Lab identified as 27.64 grams of methamphetamine.

    Subsequently, law enforcement obtained and executed a search warrant for the property where King and Miller had sold the methamphetamine previously. King was the only person present at the house at the time the search warrant was executed.

    During the search three guns were found — two in the house and one in King’s car. In addition, methamphetamine was found in a kitchen drawer.

    People of Mich v King Download

    The Court of Appeals decision explains more in regards to what happened when the search warrant was being served:

    Defendant consented to an interview with investigators while the search warrant was being
    executed. He stated that there was methamphetamine in the kitchen drawer next to the refrigerator, that he had placed it there when the police were executing the search warrant, and that he was supposed to sell the methamphetamine that he put in that drawer to someone later that night. Defendant was subsequently charged, convicted, and sentenced as earlier described. This appeal followed.

    Michigan Court of Appeals decision, State of Mich. v. King, unpublished opinion issued July 18, 2024

    In his appeal, King argued two separate but related claims.

    Defendant does not contest that the controlled substance involved in this matter was methamphetamine, nor does he challenge the amount of the substance recovered pursuant to the search warrant. Rather, he asserts that he did not agree with co-defendant Miller’s intent to sell narcotics. He claims he did not possess the same intent as Miller, nor did he knowingly
    participate in the illicit drug sale. He further avers that he did not possess methamphetamine at
    the time the search warrant was executed. Instead, defendant claims that there were others known to frequent the residence (presumably those who possessed the illicit drugs and weapons). He states on appeal that he “happened to be the only [person] present when the warrant was executed[,]” which resulted in the police discovering contraband in the home and in his vehicle.

    Michigan Court of Appeals decision, State of Mich. v. King, unpublished opinion issued July 18, 2024

    The Court of Appeals panel, consisting of Appeals Court Judges Michael Riordan, Michelle Rick and Noah Hood, reject his claims with a review of the definitions of deliver and delivery.

    King also argued the prosecution failed to prove he “knew and agreed” to co-defendant’s sale of methamphetamine. The trio wrote in the opinion, “sufficient evidence was presented to allow the jury to find beyond a reasonable doubt that defendant knew of and shared Miller’s intent to deliver methamphetamine to the detective, and that, at minimum, defendant aided and abetted in the delivery.”

    The judges affirmed his conviction.

    King was sentenced to up to 20 years in prison for his methamphetamine possession with intent to deliver convictions. He was also sentenced to over 5 years for the felon in possession of a firearm charges.

    He was a felon for convictions on criminal sexual conduct charges for actions that occurred in 2005. He was sentenced in 2010 by the Lenawee Circuit Court, served time in prison and had just completed his parole in Sept. of 2021, months before the execution of the search warrant.

    Copyright 2024 Nexstar Media Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

    For the latest news, weather, sports, and streaming video, head to WLNS 6 News.

    Expand All
    Comments / 0
    Add a Comment
    YOU MAY ALSO LIKE
    Most Popular newsMost Popular

    Comments / 0