JUDGE STEVEN PRIVETTE RUNNING UNOPPOSED: 2024 Howell County MO. Election #breakingnews #Howellcounty #2024election #Judgestevenprivette @Show Me State News Show By: Kermit D. showmestatenews@gmail.com March 27th 2024

JUDGE STEVEN PRIVETTE RUNNING UNOPPOSED Howell County, Missouri – In an unforeseen turn of events, JUDGE STEVEN PRIVETTE, the presiding circuit court judge in Howell County, is set to run unopposed in the upcoming election. With no challenger stepping forward, it raises important questions about the implications of an uncontested race and the potential courses of action available to concerned citizens. Let’s take a deeper look into the Kaos and explore the pros and cons should Honorable Steven Privette continue as Judge. Pros of Judge Privette Running Unopposed: ▪ Stability and Continuity: With Judge Privette’s experience and familiarity with the local judicial system, his unchallenged re-election would provide stability and continuity in the court’s operations. This can be seen as an advantage, ensuring a smooth transition and avoiding potential disruptions. ▪ Efficiency and Familiarity: Judge Privette’s incumbency allows him to maintain a deep understanding of the local legal landscape, court procedures, and community dynamics. This familiarity can lead to increased efficiency in handling cases, This can be seen as an advantage, ensuring a smooth transition and avoiding potential disruptions, streamlining processes, and providing a sense of predictability for those involved in the judicial system. ▪ Judicial Expertise: Judge Privette’s years of service and legal knowledge contribute to his expertise in interpreting and applying the law. His experience can prove valuable in making well-informed decisions and rulings that align with legal principles and precedents. Cons of Judge Privette Running Unopposed: ▪ Lack of Public Input: A contested election provides an opportunity for citizens to voice their preferences and concerns, ensuring their interests and values are represented. Without an opposing candidate, the absence of public input may raise questions about accountability and the ability to address diverse perspectives within the judicial system. ▪ Potential for Complacency: Unopposed races can sometimes lead to complacency among incumbents, as the absence of competition may reduce the motivation to actively seek improvement or address issues that may arise. This can hinder innovation and the drive to adapt to changing legal and societal landscapes. ▪ Missed Opportunity for Fresh Perspectives: A contested election allows for the introduction of new ideas, perspectives, and approaches to the role of a circuit court judge. With no opposing candidate, the potential for fresh insights and alternative viewpoints may be lost, limiting opportunities for growth and the infusion of new perspectives into the judiciary. POTENTIAL ACTIONS FOR CONCERNED CITIZENS: Engage in Dialogue: Concerned citizens can actively engage in discussions and dialogues with Judge Privette, expressing their opinions, concerns, and expectations for the judiciary. Open and respectful communication can foster an understanding of Monitor Judicial Decisions.